Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33539414›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2021

Optimising weight-loss interventions in cancer patients-A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Nathalie LeVasseur, Wei Cheng, Sasha Mazzarello, Mark Clemons, Lisa Vandermeer, Lee Jones, Anil Abraham Joy, Pauline Barbeau, Dianna Wolfe, Nadera Ahmadzai and 5 more

Abstract readSystematic ReviewNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Self-care behaviors in patients with cancer treated with oral anticancer agents: a systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Nathalie LeVasseurDivision of Medical Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2581-4903
Wei ChengClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
Sasha MazzarelloDivision of Medical Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, Canada.
Mark ClemonsDivision of Medical Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, Canada.
Lisa VandermeerDivision of Medical Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, Canada.
Lee JonesMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States of America.
Anil Abraham JoyDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Canada.
Pauline BarbeauOttawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
Dianna WolfeOttawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1807-6647
Nadera AhmadzaiOttawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
Mona HersiOttawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
Carol StoberDivision of Medical Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, Canada.
Risa ShorrOttawa Hospital, Ottawa, Canada.
John HiltonDivision of Medical Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, Canada.
Brian HuttonClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5662-8647

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Michael Jason de la Cruz · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Cochrane Complementary Medicine Field: Resource for ResearchR24AT001293 · NCCIH · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI BERMAN, BRIAN M, WIELAND, LISA SUSAN · 2003 to 2022
$9.4M
NCCIH NIH HHS R24 AT001293NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExcess weight has been associated with increased morbidity and a worse prognosis in adult patients with early-stage cancer. The optimal lifestyle interventions to optimize anthropometric measures amongst cancer patients and survivors remain inconsistent.

objectiveTo conduct a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effects of exercise and dietary interventions alone or in combination on anthropometric measures of adult cancer patients and survivors.

methodsA systematic search of Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Trials Registry was performed. Outcomes of interest included changes in weight, body mass index (BMI), and waist circumference. Screening and data collection were performed by two reviewers. Bayesian NMAs were performed.

resultsOverall, 98 RCTs were included; 75 were incorporated in NMAs (n = 12,199). Groups of intervention strategies included: 3 exercise interventions, 8 dietary interventions, 7 combination interventions of diet and exercise and standard care. Median intervention duration was 26 weeks. NMA suggested that diet alone (mean difference [MD] -2.25kg, 95% CrI -3.43 to -0.91kg) and combination strategies (MD -2.52kg, 95% CrI -3.54 to -1.62kg) were associated with more weight loss compared to standard care. All dietary interventions achieved a similar magnitude of weight loss (MD range from -2.03kg to -2.52kg). Both diet alone and combination strategies demonstrated greater BMI reductions versus standard care, and each of diet alone, exercise alone and combination strategies demonstrated greater reductions in waist circumference than standard care.

conclusionDiet and exercise alone or in combination are effective lifestyle interventions to improve anthropometric measures in cancer patients and survivors. All reputable diets appear to be similarly effective to achieve weight loss.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsWeight LossExerciseHumansLife StylePrognosisRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID33539414
PMCPMC7861370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.