Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33539374›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2021

Creating artificial human genomes using generative neural networks.

Burak Yelmen, Aurélien Decelle, Linda Ongaro, Davide Marnetto, Corentin Tallec, Francesco Montinaro, Cyril Furtlehner, Luca Pagani, Flora Jay

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed
9.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 130 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. BlendSplice: A Frequency-Blended Generative Framework forComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026
    Article
  10. PROVGEN: A Privacy-Preserving Approach for Outcome Validation in Genomic Research.Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies. Privacy Enhancing Technologies Symposium · 2026
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Generating synthetic genotypes using diffusion models.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025
    Article
  19. Review
  20. The design and engineering of synthetic genomes.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2025
    Review

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Burak YelmenInstitute of Genomics, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.ORCID 0000-0003-0731-0223
Aurélien DecelleLaboratoire de Recherche en Informatique, CNRS UMR 8623, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3017-0858
Linda OngaroInstitute of Genomics, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.ORCID 0000-0003-1900-3394
Davide MarnettoInstitute of Genomics, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.ORCID 0000-0001-9573-0601
Corentin TallecLaboratoire de Recherche en Informatique, CNRS UMR 8623, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-3649-720X
Francesco MontinaroInstitute of Genomics, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.ORCID 0000-0002-4506-963X
Cyril FurtlehnerLaboratoire de Recherche en Informatique, CNRS UMR 8623, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Paris, France.
Luca PaganiInstitute of Genomics, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
Flora JayLaboratoire de Recherche en Informatique, CNRS UMR 8623, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5884-4730
Université Paris-Sud · FRUniversity of Tartu · EEUniversity of Bari Aldo Moro · ITUniversity of Padua · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Generative models have shown breakthroughs in a wide spectrum of domains due to recent advancements in machine learning algorithms and increased computational power. Despite these impressive achievements, the ability of generative models to create realistic synthetic data is still under-exploited in genetics and absent from population genetics. Yet a known limitation in the field is the reduced access to many genetic databases due to concerns about violations of individual privacy, although they would provide a rich resource for data mining and integration towards advancing genetic studies. In this study, we demonstrated that deep generative adversarial networks (GANs) and restricted Boltzmann machines (RBMs) can be trained to learn the complex distributions of real genomic datasets and generate novel high-quality artificial genomes (AGs) with none to little privacy loss. We show that our generated AGs replicate characteristics of the source dataset such as allele frequencies, linkage disequilibrium, pairwise haplotype distances and population structure. Moreover, they can also inherit complex features such as signals of selection. To illustrate the promising outcomes of our method, we showed that imputation quality for low frequency alleles can be improved by data augmentation to reference panels with AGs and that the RBM latent space provides a relevant encoding of the data, hence allowing further exploration of the reference dataset and features for solving supervised tasks. Generative models and AGs have the potential to become valuable assets in genetic studies by providing a rich yet compact representation of existing genomes and high-quality, easy-access and anonymous alternatives for private databases.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationGenome, HumanMachine LearningAlgorithmsAllelesChromosomes, Human, Pair 15Databases, FactualDatabases, GeneticDeep LearningHapMap ProjectHumansMarkov ChainsNeural Networks, ComputerPolymorphism, Single NucleotidePopulation

Identifiers

PMID33539374
PMCPMC7861435
OpenAlexW3127763315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.