Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33539366›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2021

End-to-end neural system identification with neural information flow.

K Seeliger, L Ambrogioni, Y Güçlütürk, L M van den Bulk, U Güçlü, M A J van Gerven

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Making models disagree to learn how brains compute.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The neuroconnectionist research programme.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A deeper look at vision and memory.Nature neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

K SeeligerRadboud University, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5343-0595
L AmbrogioniRadboud University, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3673-0825
Y GüçlütürkRadboud University, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
L M van den BulkRadboud University, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
U GüçlüRadboud University, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4753-159X
M A J van GervenRadboud University, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neural information flow (NIF) provides a novel approach for system identification in neuroscience. It models the neural computations in multiple brain regions and can be trained end-to-end via stochastic gradient descent from noninvasive data. NIF models represent neural information processing via a network of coupled tensors, each encoding the representation of the sensory input contained in a brain region. The elements of these tensors can be interpreted as cortical columns whose activity encodes the presence of a specific feature in a spatiotemporal location. Each tensor is coupled to the measured data specific to a brain region via low-rank observation models that can be decomposed into the spatial, temporal and feature receptive fields of a localized neuronal population. Both these observation models and the convolutional weights defining the information processing within regions are learned end-to-end by predicting the neural signal during sensory stimulation. We trained a NIF model on the activity of early visual areas using a large-scale fMRI dataset recorded in a single participant. We show that we can recover plausible visual representations and population receptive fields that are consistent with empirical findings.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAdultBrainBrain MappingCognitionHumansLearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeuronsPhotic StimulationSemanticsStochastic ProcessesTelevisionVision, OcularVisual Cortex

Identifiers

PMID33539366
PMCPMC7888598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.