Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33539361›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2021

Functional parcellation of mouse visual cortex using statistical techniques reveals response-dependent clustering of cortical processing areas.

Mari Ganesh Kumar, Ming Hu, Aadhirai Ramanujan, Mriganka Sur, Hema A Murthy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A connectomics-driven analysis reveals novel characterization of border regions in mouse visual cortex.Neural networks : the official journal of the International Neural Network Society · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mari Ganesh KumarDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID 0000-0002-6765-2834
Ming HuDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5254-5315
Aadhirai RamanujanDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID 0000-0002-8094-5527
Mriganka SurDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Hema A MurthyDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID 0000-0003-3611-6550

Funding

STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION IN THE RETINOGENICULATE PATHWAYR01EY007023 · NEI · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SUR, MRIGANKA · 1985 to 2018
$5.6M
Astrocyte-neuron interactions in visual cortex circuitsR01EY028219 · NEI · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI SUR, MRIGANKA · 2018 to 2021
$2.3M
NEUROTROPHIC REQUIREMENTS OF DEVELOPING OCULAR MOTONEUROF32EY007023 · NEI · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI MACDONALD, MELANIE L · 1999 to 2000
$38k
NEI NIH HHS F32 EY007023NEI NIH HHS R01 EY007023NEI NIH HHS R01 EY028219
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The visual cortex of the mouse brain can be divided into ten or more areas that each contain complete or partial retinotopic maps of the contralateral visual field. It is generally assumed that these areas represent discrete processing regions. In contrast to the conventional input-output characterizations of neuronal responses to standard visual stimuli, here we asked whether six of the core visual areas have responses that are functionally distinct from each other for a given visual stimulus set, by applying machine learning techniques to distinguish the areas based on their activity patterns. Visual areas defined by retinotopic mapping were examined using supervised classifiers applied to responses elicited by a range of stimuli. Using two distinct datasets obtained using wide-field and two-photon imaging, we show that the area labels predicted by the classifiers were highly consistent with the labels obtained using retinotopy. Furthermore, the classifiers were able to model the boundaries of visual areas using resting state cortical responses obtained without any overt stimulus, in both datasets. With the wide-field dataset, clustering neuronal responses using a constrained semi-supervised classifier showed graceful degradation of accuracy. The results suggest that responses from visual cortical areas can be classified effectively using data-driven models. These responses likely reflect unique circuits within each area that give rise to activity with stronger intra-areal than inter-areal correlations, and their responses to controlled visual stimuli across trials drive higher areal classification accuracy than resting state responses.

Indexed as

Machine LearningAnimalsBrainBrain MappingCluster AnalysisFemaleMaleMiceMice, TransgenicModels, StatisticalNeuronsNormal DistributionPhotic StimulationPhotonsProsencephalonRetina

Identifiers

PMID33539361
PMCPMC7888605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.