Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33539338›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2021

Inferring the structures of signaling motifs from paired dynamic traces of single cells.

Raymond A Haggerty, Jeremy E Purvis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Raymond A HaggertyDepartment of Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1326-4294
Jeremy E PurvisDepartment of Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-6963-0524

Funding

UG Support Administrative Supplement: Computational Models of the Human Cell Cycle to Reveal Disease Mechanism and Inform TreatmentR01GM138834 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Jeremy Purvis · 2020 to 2026
$2.7M
Controlling Stem Cell Fate through Computational ModelingDP2HD091800 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI PURVIS, JEREMY · 2016 to 2018
$2.3M
Single-cell dynamics of the OCT4-GATA6 axis in human lung progenitorsF31HL134336 · NHLBI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI HAGGERTY, RAYMOND · 2016 to 2018
$96k
NHLBI NIH HHS F31 HL134336NICHD NIH HHS DP2 HD091800NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM138834
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individual cells show variability in their signaling dynamics that often correlates with phenotypic responses, indicating that cell-to-cell variability is not merely noise but can have functional consequences. Based on this observation, we reasoned that cell-to-cell variability under the same treatment condition could be explained in part by a single signaling motif that maps different upstream signals into a corresponding set of downstream responses. If this assumption holds, then repeated measurements of upstream and downstream signaling dynamics in a population of cells could provide information about the underlying signaling motif for a given pathway, even when no prior knowledge of that motif exists. To test these two hypotheses, we developed a computer algorithm called MISC (Motif Inference from Single Cells) that infers the underlying signaling motif from paired time-series measurements from individual cells. When applied to measurements of transcription factor and reporter gene expression in the yeast stress response, MISC predicted signaling motifs that were consistent with previous mechanistic models of transcription. The ability to detect the underlying mechanism became less certain when a cell's upstream signal was randomly paired with another cell's downstream response, demonstrating how averaging time-series measurements across a population obscures information about the underlying signaling mechanism. In some cases, motif predictions improved as more cells were added to the analysis. These results provide evidence that mechanistic information about cellular signaling networks can be systematically extracted from the dynamical patterns of single cells.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBiological PhenomenaComputational BiologyGene ExpressionGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression RegulationGene Regulatory NetworksSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSignal TransductionTranscription FactorsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID33539338
PMCPMC7889133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.