Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33539283›Full record

Observational studyBlood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue2021

Thrombophilia testing in the real-world clinical setting of thrombosis centres taking part in the Italian Start 2-Register.

Cristina Legnani, Gualtiero Palareti, Emilia Antonucci, Daniela Poli, Benilde Cosmi, Anna Falanga, Daniela Mastroiacovo, Sophie Testa, START 2-Register Investigators (Appendix 1)

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Cristina LegnaniArianna Anticoagulazione Foundation, Bologna, Italy.
Gualtiero PalaretiArianna Anticoagulazione Foundation, Bologna, Italy.
Emilia AntonucciArianna Anticoagulazione Foundation, Bologna, Italy.
Daniela PoliSOD Malattie Aterotrombotiche, University Hospital "Careggi", Florence, Italy.
Benilde CosmiAngiology and Blood Coagulation, University Hospital "S. Orsola-Malpighi", Bologna, Italy.
Anna FalangaDepartment of Immunohematology and Transfusion Medicine, "Papa Giovanni XXIII" Hospital, Bergamo, Italy.
Daniela MastroiacovoAngiology Unit, "SS Filippo and Nicola" Hospital, Avezzano (AQ), Italy.
Sophie TestaHaemostasis and Thrombosis Centre, Hospital of Cremona, Cremona, Italy.
START 2-Register Investigators (Appendix 1)
Istituti Ospitalieri di Cremona · ITOspedale Papa Giovanni XXIII · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEven though it rarely influences venous thromboembolism (VTE) treatment and the fact that it is generally discouraged, thrombophilia testing is still largely prescribed. We assessed: 1) whether/how frequently Italian thrombosis centres requested thrombophilia testing; 2) what results were obtained; and 3) if the results affected treatment and clinical results. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe examined data from 4,826 VTE patients enrolled by 19 clinical centres participating in the START 2-Register.

results57.2% of patients were tested. Numbers varied widely among centres (2.9-99.7%). Thrombophilic alterations were recorded in 18.2% of patients and the percentage of positive results was inversely correlated with that of patients tested. Significantly less patients with deep vein thrombosis (DVT) were tested, whereas more were tested when the event was idiopathic, presenting as isolated pulmonary embolism (PE), or in unusual sites. Patients with thrombophilic alterations were younger, more frequently treated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), with lower mortality and less frequently discontinued anticoagulation. DOACs were more frequently prescribed in patients with heterozygous Factor V (FV) Leiden or prothrombin mutations, whereas vitamin K antagonists were preferred in patients with inhibitor deficiencies, combined alterations or antiphospholipid syndrome (APLS). There was no difference in duration of treatment among those with or without alterations, though more APLS patients received an extended treatment course. Bleeding and thrombotic complications occurred with a similar and fairly low incidence in patients with or without thrombophilic alterations. DISCUSSION: Although general testing for thrombophilia in VTE patients is currently discouraged, more than half of the VTE patients included in the START2-Register were tested. However, there were marked differences in practice between Italian thrombosis centres. About 60% of all patients with alterations were treated with DOACs, confirming that DOACs can be a useful option for treatment of thrombophilic VTE patients, with the exclusion of those with APLS.

Indexed as

Factor Xa InhibitorsFollow-Up StudiesHumansIncidenceItalyProspective StudiesThrombophiliaThrombosisVenous ThromboembolismFactor Xa Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID33539283
PMCPMC8092043
OpenAlexW3128667340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.