ArticleJCO clinical cancer informatics2021
Explainable Tree-Based Predictions for Unplanned 30-Day Readmission of Patients With Cancer Using Clinical Embeddings.
Article in JCO clinical cancer informatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Thirty-Day Unplanned Hospital Readmissions in Patients With Cancer and the Impact of Social Determinants of Health: A Machine Learning Approach.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2023Article
- Toward Predicting 30-Day Readmission Among Oncology Patients: Identifying Timely and Actionable Risk Factors.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2023Article
- Article
- Explainable Anomaly Detection Framework for Maritime Main Engine Sensor Data.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThirty-day unplanned readmission is one of the key components in measuring quality in patient care. Risk of readmission in oncology patients may be associated with a wide variety of specific factors including laboratory results and diagnoses, and it is hard to include all such features using traditional approaches such as one-hot encoding in predictive models.
methodsWe used clinical embeddings to represent complex medical concepts in lower dimensional spaces. For predictive modeling, we used gradient-boosted trees and adopted the shapley additive explanation framework to offer consistent individualized predictions. We used retrospective inpatient data between 2013 and 2018 with temporal split for training and testing.
resultsOur best performing model predicting readmission at discharge using clinical embeddings showed a testing area under receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.78 (95% CI, 0.77 to 0.80). Use of clinical embeddings led to up to 23.1% gain in area under precision-recall curve and 6% in area under receiver operating characteristic curve. Hematology models had more performance gain over surgery and medical oncology. Our study was the first to develop (1) explainable predictive models for the hematology population and (2) dynamic models to keep track of readmission risk throughout the duration of patient visit.
conclusionTo our knowledge, our study was the first to develop (1) explainable predictive models for the hematology population and (2) dynamic models to keep track of readmission risk throughout the duration of patient visit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.