Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33538956›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2021

Development and Pilot Testing of a Patient-Centered Web-Based Reproductive Decision Support Tool for Primary Care.

Lisa S Callegari, Karin M Nelson, David E Arterburn, Christine Dehlendorf, Sara L Magnusson, Samantha K Benson, E Bimla Schwarz, Sonya Borrero

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lisa S CallegariHealth Services Research and Development, Seattle-Denver Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA. lisa.callegari@va.gov.ORCID 0000-0003-1303-806X
Karin M NelsonHealth Services Research and Development, Seattle-Denver Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA.
David E ArterburnKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
Christine DehlendorfDepartment of Family Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Sara L MagnussonHealth Services Research and Development, Seattle-Denver Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA.
Samantha K BensonHealth Services Research and Development, Seattle-Denver Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA.
E Bimla SchwarzDepartment of Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA.
Sonya BorreroCenter for Health Equity, Research, and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Health Care System, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

Funding

Reproductive Planning for Women VeteransIK2HX001736 · VA · VA PUGET SOUND HEALTHCARE SYSTEM · PI CALLEGARI, LISA SUSANNE · 2019 to 2020
–
HSRD VA IK2 HX001736VA CDA 14-412
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient-centered counseling to help women achieve their reproductive goals is an essential yet often absent component of primary care.

objectiveWe developed and piloted MyPath, a novel web-based decision support tool integrating reproductive goals assessment, information about optimizing health before pregnancy, and contraceptive decision support, for use prior to primary care visits in the Veterans Administration (VA).

designWe created MyPath using best practices for decision tool development, including a conceptual framework informed by theory and user-centered design with input from patients, providers, and scientific experts. We conducted a non-randomized pilot in two VA Women's Health primary care clinics. A control group (n = 28) was recruited prior to and intervention group (n = 30) recruited after introduction of MyPath into clinics.

participantsWomen Veterans ages 18-44 with an upcoming visit scheduled with one of eight providers.

interventionsAfter recruitment of controls, providers and staff received a brief introduction to MyPath. Patients scheduled to see providers in the intervention phase used MyPath on an iPad in the waiting room prior to their visit. MAIN MEASURES: Acceptability, feasibility, discussions about pregnancy and/or contraceptive needs, and contraceptive decision quality by a survey of participants and providers. KEY

resultsNearly all participants who used MyPath reported they learned new information (97%) and would recommend it to other Veterans (93%). No providers reported that MyPath significantly increased workload. A greater proportion of intervention participants reported having discussions about reproductive needs in their visit compared to controls (93% vs 68%; p = 0.02). Intervention participants also experienced greater increases in pre-/post-visit knowledge and communication self-efficacy and a trend towards greater reduction in contraceptive decision conflict compared to controls.

conclusionsMyPath was highly acceptable to women, increased the proportion of primary care visits addressing reproductive needs, and improved decision quality without increasing providers' perceived workload. A larger randomized evaluation of effectiveness is warranted.

Indexed as

Decision Making, Computer-AssistedPatient-Centered CarePrimary Health CareAdolescentAdultCounselingFemaleHumansInternetPilot ProjectsPregnancyUnited StatesUnited States Department of Veterans AffairsWomen's HealthYoung Adultcontraceptiondecision aidsfamily planningMyPathpatient-centered carepreconception careprepregnancy counselingreproductive healthshared decision-makingwomen Veterans

Identifiers

PMID33538956
PMCPMC8481447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.