Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33538951›Full record

ArticlePlant molecular biology2021

Comparative transcriptome analyses between cultivated and wild grapes reveal conservation of expressed genes but extensive rewiring of co-expression networks.

Thor V M Fajardo, Vera Quecini

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Plant molecular biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  3. Evolution of weedy giant ragweed (Ecology and evolution · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Thor V M FajardoEmbrapa Uva e Vinho (Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation, Grape and Wine Research Center), Rua Livramento, 515, Bento Gonçalves, RS, 95701-008, Brazil.
Vera QueciniEmbrapa Uva e Vinho (Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation, Grape and Wine Research Center), Rua Livramento, 515, Bento Gonçalves, RS, 95701-008, Brazil. vera.quecini@embrapa.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7806-3309

Funding

CNPq 307031/2010-1CNPq 400120/2016-0Sistema Embrapa de Gestão 02.11.01.014.00.00Sistema Embrapa de Gestão 02.13.14.002.00.00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

key messageThe transcriptomes of wild and cultivated grapes consists of similar expressed genes but distinct wiring of co-expressed modules associated with environmental conditions. Grapevine is an important fruit crop worldwide, with high economic value and widespread distribution. Commercial production is based on Vitis vinifera, and, to a lesser extent, on hybrids with American grapes, such as V. labrusca. Wild grape relatives are important sources of resistance against biotic and abiotic factors; however, their global gene expression patterns remain poorly characterized. We associated genome-wide transcript profiling to phenotypic analyses to investigate the responses of cultivated and wild vines to vineyard conditions. The expressed genes in the Vitis reference transcriptome are largely shared by wild grapes, V. labrusca hybrids and vinifera cultivars. In contrast, significant differential regulation between wild and vinifera genotypes represents 80% of gene expression variation, regardless of the environment. In wild grapes, genes associated to regulatory processes are downregulated, whereas those involved in metabolic pathways are upregulated, in comparison to vinifera. Photosynthesis-related ontologies are overrepresented in the induced genes, in agreement with higher contents of chlorophyll in wild grapes. Co-regulated gene network analyses provide evidence of more complex transcriptome organization in vinifera. In wild grapes, genes involved in signaling pathways of stress-related hormones are overrepresented in modules associated with the environment. Consensus network analyses revealed high preservation within co-regulated gene modules between cultivated and wild grapes, but divergent relationships among the expression clusters. In conclusion, the distinct phenotypes of wild and cultivated grapes are underlain by differences in gene expression, but also by distinct higher-order organization of the transcriptome and contrasting association of co-expressed gene clusters with the environment.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, PlantGene Regulatory NetworksCluster AnalysisPhenotypePlant Growth RegulatorsPrincipal Component AnalysisSignal TransductionTranscription, GeneticTranscriptomeVitisPlant Growth RegulatorsEnvironmental conditionsGrapevineNetwork analysisParthenocissusPhenologyTranscriptomeVitaceae

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.