ArticleDer Unfallchirurg2021
[Emergency intervention rate in the emergency room depending on the alerting criteria : Prospective data analysis of a supraregional trauma center].
Article in Der Unfallchirurg, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Criteria for trauma team activation and staffing requirements for the management of patients with (suspected) multiple and/or severe injuries in the resuscitation room- a systematic review and clinical practice guideline update.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025Pooled it
- [Trauma team activation-Who should be alerted for which patients?]Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Trauma team alert (TTA) to the emergency room (ER) takes place in the event of disturbed vital signs or serious injuries (A criteria) or after a dangerous accident (B criteria). Due to low specificity and limited personnel resources, TTA is questioned for B criteria. The consequences would be an increase in undertriage and thus endangering patients. Due to the lack of data it is unclear whether adapted ER teams would be a solution to the problem.The aim of the study was to describe ER patients according to the TTA criteria and to collect the corresponding emergency intervention rates in ER.Over 1 year, all TTAs of a supraregional trauma center were prospectively recorded, categorized according to TTA criteria (A, B and NULL criteria) and compared descriptively. NULL criteria were TTAs for which neither A nor B criteria were met. Treatment data were documented according to the TraumaRegister DGU® standard form. Emergency interventions were intubation, chest tube, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, transfusion, coagulation substitution, external pelvic stabilization and surgical hemostasis.The TTA due to A, B and NULL criteria were performed in 19.5%, 51.2% and 29.3%, respectively. The mean injury severity (ISS ± standard deviation) was 20.6 ± 21.3 for A criteria, significantly higher than for B criteria (8.0 ± 7.1) and NULL criteria (5.6 ± 8.2). The emergency intervention rate for A , B and NULL criteria was 75%, 6% and 2.1%, respectively.Differentiation according to the TTA criteria results in patient collectives with different injury severity and emergency intervention rates. This result justifies considerations to adjust team composition based on TTA criteria, as long as it is ensured that critical conditions can be identified and remedied by adapted teams.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.