ArticleJAMA network open2021
Diagnostic Accuracy and Acceptability of the Primary Care Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Screen for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Fifth Edition) Among US Veterans.
Article in JAMA network open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 85 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
85 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The diagnostic accuracy of PTSD assessment instruments used in older adults: a systematic review.European journal of psychotraumatology · 2025Pooled it
- An Evidence Map of the Women Veterans' Health Literature, 2016 to 2023: A Systematic Review.JAMA network open · 2025Pooled it
- Comparing two posttraumatic stress disorder screening approaches to improve health outcomes in pregnant black women: a comparative effectiveness trial protocol.European journal of psychotraumatology · 2026Trial
- Smoke-Free Home Intervention in Permanent Supportive Housing: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2026Trial
- Assessing the utility of the PC-PTSD-5 as a screening tool among a cancer survivor sample.Cancer · 2024Trial
- An examination of the criterion-related validity of varying methods of indexing clinically significant change in posttraumatic stress disorder treatment.Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy · 2024Trial
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Mental Health Screening Tools After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.JAMA network open · 2024Trial
- Reliable and clinically significant change in the clinician-administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 and PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 among male veterans.Psychological assessment · 2022Trial
- Screening PTSD in clinical populations within East Africa: results from the first follow-up study of NeuroGAP-psychosis.European journal of psychotraumatology · 2026Article
- Anxiety sensitivity, discrimination, and posttraumatic stress among Black, Hispanic, and Native American compared to White individuals.Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy · 2026Article
- Attitudes toward tobacco-free and cannabis-free policies among residents in permanent supportive housing who use tobacco, cannabis, and other substances.Addictive behaviors reports · 2026Article
- Positive Mental Health Screens in the Veterans Health Administration, 2021 to 2024.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptoms and Gynecological-Related Distress in Trauma-Exposed Women Veterans.Journal of women's health (2002) · 2026Article
- The short-term stability and reliability of daily estimates of posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms.Journal of traumatic stress · 2026Article
- A short communication of pain outcomes following a pharmacist-delivered alcohol and opioid use reduction intervention.Drug and alcohol dependence reports · 2026Article
- A psychometric examination of computerized adaptive measures of posttraumatic stress disorder among military veterans.Psychological assessment · 2026Article
- Clinical utility and psychometric validity of the International Adjustment Disorder Questionnaire in a sample of South African working adults.The South African journal of psychiatry : SAJP : the journal of the Society of Psychiatrists of South Africa · 2026Article
- Exploratory analysis of pharmacist involvement in motivational interviewing intervention for patients with prescription opioid misuse behaviors.JAPhA practice innovations · 2026Article
- Symptoms of Posttraumatic Stress and Disturbances in Self-Organization Differentially Predict Functional Impairment in Women Veterans with Military Sexual Trauma.Traumatology · 2026Article
- "Voice of concern" for rural veterans with PTSD: Care managers' role engaging rural veterans in evidence-based therapies via telemedicine.Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy · 2025Article
25 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a serious mental health disorder that can be effectively treated with empirically based practices. PTSD screening is essential for identifying undetected cases and providing patients with appropriate care. Objective: To determine whether the Primary Care PTSD screen for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Fifth Edition) (PC-PTSD-5) is a diagnostically accurate and acceptable measure for use in Veterans Affairs (VA) primary care clinics. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional, diagnostic accuracy study enrolled participants from May 19, 2017, to September 26, 2018. Participants were recruited from primary care clinics across 2 VA Medical Centers. Session 1 was conducted in person, and session 2 was completed within 30 days via telephone. A consecutive sample of 1594 veterans, aged 18 years or older, who were scheduled for a primary care visit was recruited. Data analysis was performed from March 2019 to August 2020. Exposures: In session 1, participants completed a battery of questionnaires. In session 2, a research assistant administered the PC-PTSD-5 to participants, and then a clinician assessor blind to PC-PTSD-5 results conducted a structured diagnostic interview for PTSD. Main Outcomes and Measures: The range of PC-PTSD-5 cut points overall and across gender was assessed, and diagnostic performance was evaluated by calculating weighted κ values. Results: In total, 495 of 1594 veterans (31%) participated, and 396 completed all measures and were included in the analyses. Participants were demographically similar to the VA primary care population (mean [SD] age, 61.4 [15.5] years; age range, 21-93 years) and were predominantly male (333 participants [84.1%]) and White (296 of 394 participants [75.1%]). The PC-PTSD-5 had high levels of diagnostic accuracy for the overall sample (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC], 0.927; 95% CI, 0.896-0.959), men (AUC, 0.932; 95% CI, 0.894-0.969), and women (AUC, 0.899, 95% CI, 0.824-0.974). A cut point of 4 ideally balanced false negatives and false positives for the overall sample and for men. However, for women, this cut point resulted in high numbers of false negatives (6 veterans [33.3%]). A cut point of 3 fit better for women, despite increasing the number of false positives. Participants rated the PC-PTSD-5 as highly acceptable. Conclusions and Relevance: The PC-PTSD-5 is an accurate and acceptable screening tool for use in VA primary care settings. Because performance parameters will change according to sample, clinicians should consider sample characteristics and screening purposes when selecting a cut point.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.