Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33538350›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2021

Exploring label dynamics of velocity-selective arterial spin labeling in the kidney.

Isabell K Bones, Suzanne L Franklin, Anita A Harteveld, Matthias J P van Osch, Sophie Schmid, Jeroen Hendrikse, Chrit Moonen, Marijn van Stralen, Clemens Bos

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Isabell K BonesCenter for Image Sciences, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7916-5013
Suzanne L FranklinCenter for Image Sciences, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6886-5578
Anita A HarteveldCenter for Image Sciences, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3379-0710
Matthias J P van OschC.J. Gorter Center for High Field MRI, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7034-8959
Sophie SchmidC.J. Gorter Center for High Field MRI, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0750-7798
Jeroen HendrikseDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Chrit MoonenCenter for Image Sciences, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Marijn van StralenCenter for Image Sciences, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Clemens BosCenter for Image Sciences, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
University Medical Center Utrecht · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NLErasmus MC · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeVelocity-selective arterial spin labeling (VSASL) has been proposed for renal perfusion imaging to mitigate planning challenges and effects of arterial transit time (ATT) uncertainties. In VSASL, label generation may shift in the vascular tree as a function of cutoff velocity. Here, we investigate label dynamics and especially the ATT of renal VSASL and compared it with a spatially selective pulsed arterial spin labeling technique, flow alternating inversion recovery (FAIR).

methodsArterial spin labeling data were acquired in 7 subjects, using free-breathing dual VSASL and FAIR with five postlabeling delays: 400, 800, 1200, 2000, and 2600 ms. The VSASL measurements were acquired with cutoff velocities of 5, 10, and 15 cm/s, with anterior-posterior velocity-encoding direction. Cortical perfusion-weighted signal, temporal SNR, quantified renal blood flow, and arterial transit time were reported.

resultsIn contrast to FAIR, renal VSASL already showed fairly high signal at the earliest postlabeling delays, for all cutoff velocities. The highest VSASL signal and temporal SNR was obtained with a cutoff velocity of 10 cm/s at postlabeling delay = 800 ms, which was earlier than for FAIR at 1200 ms. Fitted ATT on VSASL was ≤ 0 ms, indicating ATT insensitivity, which was shorter than for FAIR (189 ± 79 ms, P < .05). Finally, the average cortical renal blood flow measured with cutoff velocities of 5 cm/s (398 ± 84 mL/min/100 g) and 10 cm/s (472 ± 160 mL/min/100 g) were similar to renal blood flow measured with FAIR (441 ± 84 mL/min/100 g) (P > .05) with good correlations on subject level.

conclusionVelocity-selective arterial spin labeling in the kidney reduces ATT sensitivity compared with the recommended pulsed arterial spin labeling method, as well as if cutoff velocity is increased to reduce spurious labeling due to motion. Thus, VSASL has potential as a method for time-efficient, single-time-point, free-breathing renal perfusion measurements, despite lower tSNR than FAIR.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsArteriesCerebrovascular CirculationHumansKidneyReproducibility of ResultsSpin LabelsSpin Labelsarterial spin labelingBuxton curveFAIRmulti-PLD ASLrenal perfusionvelocity-selective labeling

Identifiers

PMID33538350
PMCPMC8048977
OpenAlexW3127447613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.