Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33538164›Full record

ArticleAnalytical chemistry2021

Evaluation of Fumaric Acid and Maleic Acid as Internal Standards for NMR Analysis of Protein Precipitated Plasma, Serum, and Whole Blood.

G A Nagana Gowda, Natalie N Hong, Daniel Raftery

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical chemistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. HarmonizedAnalytical chemistry · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Quantitative plasma profiling byFrontiers in molecular biosciences · 2023
    Article
  10. Quantitative NMR Methods in Metabolomics.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Extending the Scope ofAnalytical chemistry · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. NMR-based metabolomics: Where are we now and where are we going?Progress in nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Natalie N Hong
Daniel RafteryFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington 98109, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2467-8118
University of Washington · USFred Hutch Cancer Center · US

Funding

Translational Bioimaging Core Shared ResourceP30CA015704 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI Eric Collisson · 1985 to 2026
$296.4M
Modeling Homeostasis of Human Blood MetabolitesR01GM131491 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI RAFTERY, DANIEL, ZHANG, DABAO · 2020 to 2023
$2.2M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA015704NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM131491
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Significant advances have been made in unknown metabolite identification and expansion of the number of quantifiable metabolites in human plasma, serum, and whole blood using NMR spectroscopy. However, reliable quantitation of metabolites is still a challenge. A major bottleneck is the lack of a suitable internal standard that does not interact with the complex blood sample matrix and also does not overlap with metabolite peaks apart from exhibiting other favorable characteristics. With the goal of addressing this challenge, a comprehensive investigation of fumaric and maleic acids as potential internal standards was made along with a comparison with the conventional standards, TSP (trimethylsilylpropionic acid) and DSS (trimethylsilylpropanesulfonic acid). Both fumaric acid and maleic acid exhibited a surprisingly high performance with a quantitation error <1%, while the TSP and DSS caused an average error of up to 35% in plasma, serum, and whole blood. Further, the results indicate that while fumaric acid is a robust standard for all three biospecimens, maleic acid is suitable for only plasma and serum. Maleic acid is not suited for the analysis of whole blood due to its overlap with coenzyme peaks. These findings provide new opportunities for improved and accurate quantitation of metabolites in human plasma, serum, and whole blood using NMR spectroscopy. Moreover, the use of protein precipitation prior to NMR analysis mirrors the sample preparation commonly used for mass spectrometry based metabolomics, such that these findings further strengthen efforts to combine and compare NMR and MS based metabolite data of human plasma, serum, and whole blood for metabolomics based research.

Indexed as

PlasmaSerumFumaratesHumansMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyMaleatesMetabolomicsFumaratesfumaric acidMaleatesmaleic acid

Identifiers

PMID33538164
PMCPMC8822163
OpenAlexW3129097369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.