ArticleAnalytical chemistry2021
Evaluation of Fumaric Acid and Maleic Acid as Internal Standards for NMR Analysis of Protein Precipitated Plasma, Serum, and Whole Blood.
Article in Analytical chemistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- HarmonizedAnalytical chemistry · 2026Article
- Wool-supported Pd and Rh nanoparticles for selective hydrogenation of maleic acid to succinic acid in batch and flow systems.RSC advances · 2025Article
- Identification and Distribution of the Dietary Antioxidant Ergothioneine in Humans and Animal Models Combining NMR, RANSY, and MS Methods.Analytical chemistry · 2025Article
- Discovery of Hypoxanthine and Inosine as Robust Biomarkers for Predicting the Preanalytical Quality of Human Plasma and Serum for Metabolomics.Analytical chemistry · 2024Article
- Monitoring live mitochondrial metabolism in real-time using NMR spectroscopy.Magnetic resonance in chemistry : MRC · 2023Article
- Anomalous Dynamics of Labile Metabolites in Cold Human Blood Detected UsingAnalytical chemistry · 2023Article
- NMR metabolite quantification of a synthetic urine sample: an inter-laboratory comparison of processing workflows.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2023Article
- NMR Metabolomics Methods for Investigating Disease.Analytical chemistry · 2023Review
- Quantitative plasma profiling byFrontiers in molecular biosciences · 2023Article
- Quantitative NMR Methods in Metabolomics.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2023Article
- Preanalytical Pitfalls in Untargeted Plasma Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Metabolomics of Endocrine Hypertension.Metabolites · 2022Article
- Elevated Circulatory Proline to Glutamine Ratio (PQR) in Endometriosis and Its Potential as a Diagnostic Biomarker.ACS omega · 2022Article
- Methodology for Single Bee and Bee BrainMetabolites · 2021Article
- Extending the Scope ofAnalytical chemistry · 2021Article
- Detection of Lung Cancer via Blood Plasma andMetabolites · 2021Article
- NMR-based metabolomics: Where are we now and where are we going?Progress in nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Significant advances have been made in unknown metabolite identification and expansion of the number of quantifiable metabolites in human plasma, serum, and whole blood using NMR spectroscopy. However, reliable quantitation of metabolites is still a challenge. A major bottleneck is the lack of a suitable internal standard that does not interact with the complex blood sample matrix and also does not overlap with metabolite peaks apart from exhibiting other favorable characteristics. With the goal of addressing this challenge, a comprehensive investigation of fumaric and maleic acids as potential internal standards was made along with a comparison with the conventional standards, TSP (trimethylsilylpropionic acid) and DSS (trimethylsilylpropanesulfonic acid). Both fumaric acid and maleic acid exhibited a surprisingly high performance with a quantitation error <1%, while the TSP and DSS caused an average error of up to 35% in plasma, serum, and whole blood. Further, the results indicate that while fumaric acid is a robust standard for all three biospecimens, maleic acid is suitable for only plasma and serum. Maleic acid is not suited for the analysis of whole blood due to its overlap with coenzyme peaks. These findings provide new opportunities for improved and accurate quantitation of metabolites in human plasma, serum, and whole blood using NMR spectroscopy. Moreover, the use of protein precipitation prior to NMR analysis mirrors the sample preparation commonly used for mass spectrometry based metabolomics, such that these findings further strengthen efforts to combine and compare NMR and MS based metabolite data of human plasma, serum, and whole blood for metabolomics based research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.