Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33538058›Full record

SynthesisArthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.)2021

Long-Term Outcomes in Patients With Connective Tissue Disease-Associated Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension in the Modern Treatment Era: Meta-Analyses of Randomized, Controlled Trials and Observational Registries.

Dinesh Khanna, Carol Zhao, Rajan Saggar, Stephen C Mathai, Lorinda Chung, J Gerry Coghlan, Mehul Shah, John Hartney, Vallerie McLaughlin

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Management of pulmonary arterial hypertension in systemic sclerosis: from classical treatments to new horizons.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Treatment algorithm for pulmonary arterial hypertension.The European respiratory journal · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Dinesh KhannaUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor.ORCID 0000-0003-1412-4453
Carol ZhaoActelion Pharmaceuticals US, Inc., South San Francisco, California.
Rajan SaggarUniversity of California, Los Angeles.ORCID 0000-0002-5536-5934
Stephen C MathaiJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Lorinda ChungStanford University, Palo Alto, California.
J Gerry CoghlanRoyal Free Hospital London, London, UK.
Mehul ShahActelion Pharmaceuticals US, Inc., South San Francisco, California.
John HartneyActelion Pharmaceuticals US, Inc., South San Francisco, California.
Vallerie McLaughlinUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Actelion (United States) · USUniversity of Michigan · USJohns Hopkins University · USPalo Alto University · USThe Royal Free Hospital · GBUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveData on the magnitude of benefit of modern therapies for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) in connective tissue disease (CTD)-associated PAH are limited. In this study, we performed meta-analyses of randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) and registries to quantify the benefit of these modern therapies in patients with CTD-PAH.

methodsThe PubMed and Embase databases were searched for articles reporting data from RCTs or registries published between January 1, 2000 and November 25, 2019. Eligibility criteria included multicenter studies with ≥30 CTD-PAH patients. For an RCT to be included, the trial had to evaluate an approved PAH therapy, and long-term risks of clinical morbidity and mortality or 6-minute walk distance had to be reported. For a registry to be included, survival rates had to be reported. Random-effects models were used to pool the data.

resultsEleven RCTs (total of 4,329 patients; 1,267 with CTD-PAH) and 19 registries (total of 9,739 patients; 4,008 with CTD-PAH) were included. Investigational therapy resulted in a 36% reduction in the risk of clinical morbidity/mortality events both in the overall PAH population (hazard ratio [HR] 0.64, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.54, 0.75; P < 0.001) and in CTD-PAH patients (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.51, 0.81; P < 0.001) as compared to control subjects. The survival rate was lower in CTD-PAH patients compared to all PAH patients (survival rate 62%, 95% CI 57, 67% versus 72%, 95% CI 69, 75% at 3 years). The survival rate in CTD-PAH patients treated primarily after 2010 was higher than that in CTD-PAH patients treated before 2010 (survival rate 73%, 95% CI 62, 81% versus 65%, 95% CI 59, 71% at 3 years).

conclusionModern therapy provides a similar reduction in morbidity/mortality risk in patients with CTD-PAH when compared to the PAH population overall. Risk of death is higher in CTD-PAH patients than in those with PAH overall, but survival has improved in the last 10 years, which may be related to increased screening and/or new treatment approaches. Early detection of PAH in patients with CTD and up-front intensive treatment are warranted.

Indexed as

Connective Tissue DiseasesDisease ProgressionHumansObservational Studies as TopicPulmonary Arterial HypertensionRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRegistriesSurvival RateTreatment OutcomeWalk Test

Identifiers

PMID33538058
PMCPMC8251834
OpenAlexW3127813230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.