Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33537889›Full record

ArticleBrain structure & function2021

Associations between different white matter properties and reward-based performance modulation.

Haeme R P Park, Helena Verhelst, Michel Quak, Ben Jeurissen, Ruth M Krebs

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Brain structure & function, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Haeme R P ParkDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium. haeme.park@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8680-4346
Helena VerhelstDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6861-0249
Michel QuakDepartment of Experimental Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7948-7226
Ben JeurissenDepartment of Physics, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3488-9819
Ruth M KrebsDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0676-7611
Ghent University · BEGhent University Hospital · BEUniversity College Ghent · BEUniversity of Antwerp · BE

Funding

H2020 European Research Council 636116
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans can be motivated by the prospect of gaining a reward. However, the extent to which we are affected by reward information differs from person to person. A possible mechanism underlying these inter-individual differences may be alterations in white matter (WM) microstructure; however, the relationship between WM properties and reward-based behaviour in healthy participants has not yet been explored. Here, we used a fixel-based approach to investigate potential associations between WM tracts and performance in a reward-cuing task. We found that WM properties in the corpus callosum, right uncinate fasciculus, left ventral cingulum, and accumbofrontal tracts were inversely related to reward-triggered performance benefits (indexed by faster reaction times). Moreover, smaller WM property values in the corpus callosum, uncinate fasciculus, and accumbofrontal tracts were associated with higher scores on the Behavioral Inhibition System scale, reflecting greater sensitivity to potential punishment. Finally, we also observed associations between functional hemodynamic activity in the ventral striatum and WM microstructure. The finding that reward-based behavioural benefits are related to lower measures of WM tracts is in contrast to studies linking higher WM metrics to superior cognitive performance. We interpret the current pattern in terms of higher susceptibility to motivationally relevant stimuli, which is in line with the current and previous studies reporting inverse relationships between WM properties and motivational traits. Taking a broader perspective, such propensities may only be beneficial up to a certain point, at which these may become detrimental to performance and even manifest as impulsive and addictive behaviour.

Indexed as

RewardWhite MatterCorpus CallosumHumansImpulsive BehaviorNerve NetDiffusionFixel-based analysisInter-individual differencesMRIRewardWhite matter

Identifiers

PMID33537889
OpenAlexW3128513070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.