ArticleHNO2021
[Electronic learning for otorhinolaryngology students using the content management system ILIAS].
Article in HNO, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWith increasing access to online teaching materials, traditional teaching methods at universities need to be questioned in the context of digital transformation. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether electronic learning may serve as or replace conventional internship in otorhinolaryngology. MATERIALS AND
methodsA completely digital electronic learning concept was created and made available at the online learning platform ILIAS. Students were introduced to the program. Four learning units (neck [I], pharynx/larynx [II], nose [III], ear [IV]) were set up, with a topic-related multiple-choice test at the end of each unit. The students took part in the evaluation before and after completion of the course.
resultsA total of 105 students participated in the evaluation before and 85 students after the electronic learning program. After completing the courses, the majority of students (52.94%) stated to be more satisfied with the content and the presentation of the learning sequences as well as with their own self-control concerning learning pace and time management compared to the situation before completing the program (34.29%; p < 0.0001). The majority of students (54.12%) stated that they would appreciate the electronic learning program in addition to practical internship.
conclusionThe electronic learning program is a promising approach to supplement traditional learning and internships. An expansion of digital teaching proposals should be supported based on this study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.