ArticleAdvances in therapy2021
Clinical Impact of Adherence to NCCN Guidelines for Biomarker Testing and First-Line Treatment in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (aNSCLC) Using Real-World Electronic Health Record Data.
Article in Advances in therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- Supernatant from endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration samples for molecular profiling in NSCLC: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025Pooled it
- Single-session agreement of ChatGPT and Gemini treatment recommendations with multidisciplinary tumor board decisions in thoracic oncology.BMC cancer · 2026Observational
- Real-World Adherence Patterns of Comprehensive Genomic Profiling to Biomarker Recommended Therapies in Patients With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.JCO oncology practice · 2026Article
- Biomarker Testing Rates and Patterns in Patients With Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Prospective, Observational Study in Community Practices.JCO precision oncology · 2026Observational
- Molecular subtyping and prognostic modeling of non-small cell lung cancer based on disulfidptosis-related genes.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Real-world management of oral mucositis/stomatitis among patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or breast cancer (BC).Future oncology (London, England) · 2026Article
- Molecular Biomarker Testing Patterns and Turnaround Time in US Patients With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN · 2025Article
- Evaluation of implementation of evolving practice patterns in the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer in Turkiye (ESTIMATE): a national, multicenter, retrospective, real-world evidence study.Future oncology (London, England) · 2025Article
- Expert recommendations for biomarker evaluation of advanced non-small cell lung cancer in Thailand.Translational lung cancer research · 2025Review
- Biomarker Testing Approaches, Treatment Selection, and Cost of Care Among Adults With Advanced Cancer.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Clinical Practice Guidelines Adherence and the Impact on Health Outcomes in Oncology: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Clinical and public health guidelines · 2025Article
- Real-World Treatment Patterns and Outcomes Among Patients with Early Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Observational
- Perspectives on Reducing Barriers to the Adoption of Digital and Computational Pathology Technology by Clinical Labs.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Differences in biomarker testing in non-small cell lung cancer: real-world outcomes within an integrated healthcare system.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
- Omission of staging PET/CT linked to reduced survival in stage III non-small cell lung cancer: insights from the LUCAS project real-world data.Translational lung cancer research · 2024Article
- Cost-effectiveness of large-panel next-generation sequencing in guiding first-line treatment decisions for patients with nonsquamous advanced non-small cell lung cancer.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2024Article
- Evaluation of the effectiveness of a nationwide precision medicine program for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer in Germany: a historical cohort analysis.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2024Article
- Three-year follow-up study reveals improved survival rate in NSCLC patients underwent guideline-concordant diagnosis and treatment.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Diagnosis, testing, treatment, and outcomes among patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer in the United States.Cancer medicine · 2023Article
- Clinical Trial and Real-World Outcomes of Patients With Metastatic NSCLC in the Post-Platinum-Based Chemotherapy Failure Setting.JTO clinical and research reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAlthough clinical guidelines are broadly available, the relationship between adherence and outcomes is not well studied. This study aimed to assess the association between adherence to National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines and clinical outcomes for adult patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (aNSCLC).
methodsThis was a retrospective cohort study of adult patients with aNSCLC (stages IIIB, IIIC, and IV) from a de-identified real-world database. The objective was accomplished in a two-step analysis process. We first assessed adherence to NCCN recommendations for biomarker testing and overall survival (OS). Next, we assessed adherence to NCCN-recommended first-line therapy and time to treatment discontinuation (TTD). Multivariable Cox regression analyses were conducted to evaluate the association between guideline adherence and patient outcomes. Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to assess median OS and TTD.
resultsA total of 28,784 patients with a diagnosis for aNSCLC between January 1, 2011 and July 31, 2019 met the inclusion criteria for the analysis of NCCN-recommended biomarker testing adherence. Two-thirds of these patients (n = 19,787) had evidence of biomarker testing (adherent). Multivariable Cox models found that testing-adherent patients had a significantly lower risk of mortality [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.89, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.86, 0.92; p < 0.01]. Median OS was modestly longer in the testing-adherent group compared to the testing-non-adherent group (15.4 vs. 14.2 months; p < 0.01). For the first-line therapy analysis, 15,898 patients met the inclusion criteria, of which 69.9% had evidence of appropriate first-line therapy (first-line-adherent). The multivariable Cox model found that adherent patients had significantly lower risk of treatment discontinuation versus non-adherent patients (HR = 0.60, 95% CI 0.57, 0.62; p < 0.01). First-line-adherent patients had a modest, yet significantly longer median TTD compared to first-line-non-adherent patients (3.45 vs. 2.40 months; p < 0.01).
conclusionsImproved clinical outcomes were observed in patients who were adherent to NCCN-recommended biomarker testing and first-line therapy. This study demonstrated the value of following NCCN guideline recommendations and the need to prioritize timely access to biomarker testing and individualized treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.