Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33537753›Full record

ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2021

Why can deep convolutional neural networks improve protein fold recognition? A visual explanation by interpretation.

Yan Liu, Yi-Heng Zhu, Xiaoning Song, Jiangning Song, Dong-Jun Yu

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Predicting Transcription Factor Binding Sites with Deep Learning.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Yan LiuSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, 200 Xiaolingwei, Nanjing, 210094, China.
Yi-Heng ZhuDepartment of Computer Science, Jiangnan University, No. 1800 Lihu Avenue, Wuxi, 214122, China.
Xiaoning SongBiomedicine Discovery Institute and Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3800, Australia.
Jiangning SongMonash Centre for Data Science, Faculty of Information Technology, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3800, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8031-9086
Dong-Jun YuSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, 200 Xiaolingwei, Nanjing, 210094, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6786-8053
Nanjing University of Science and Technology · CNAustralian Regenerative Medicine Institute · AUJiangnan University · CNMonash University · AU

Funding

New Tricks for 'Old' Drugs: PK/PD of Polymyxin Nonantibiotic CombinationsR01AI111965 · NIAID · MONASH UNIVERSITY · PI LI, JIAN · 2014 to 2018
$4.3M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI111965
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As an essential task in protein structure and function prediction, protein fold recognition has attracted increasing attention. The majority of the existing machine learning-based protein fold recognition approaches strongly rely on handcrafted features, which depict the characteristics of different protein folds; however, effective feature extraction methods still represent the bottleneck for further performance improvement of protein fold recognition. As a powerful feature extractor, deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) can automatically extract discriminative features for fold recognition without human intervention, which has demonstrated an impressive performance on protein fold recognition. Despite the encouraging progress, DCNN often acts as a black box, and as such, it is challenging for users to understand what really happens in DCNN and why it works well for protein fold recognition. In this study, we explore the intrinsic mechanism of DCNN and explain why it works for protein fold recognition using a visual explanation technique. More specifically, we first trained a VGGNet-based DCNN model, termed VGGNet-FE, which can extract fold-specific features from the predicted protein residue-residue contact map for protein fold recognition. Subsequently, based on the trained VGGNet-FE, we implemented a new contact-assisted predictor, termed VGGfold, for protein fold recognition; we then visualized what features were extracted by each of the convolutional layers in VGGNet-FE using a deconvolution technique. Furthermore, we visualized the high-level semantic information, termed fold-discriminative region, of a predicted contact map from the localization map obtained from the last convolutional layer of VGGNet-FE. It is visually confirmed that VGGNet-FE could effectively extract distinct fold-discriminative regions for different types of protein folds, thereby accounting for the improved performance of VGGfold for protein fold recognition. In summary, this study is of great significance for both understanding the working principle of DCNNs in protein fold recognition and exploring the relationship between the predicted protein contact map and protein tertiary structure. This proposed visualization method is flexible and applicable to address other DCNN-based bioinformatics and computational biology questions. The online web server of VGGfold is freely available at http://csbio.njust.edu.cn/bioinf/vggfold/.

Indexed as

Machine LearningNeural Networks, ComputerProtein FoldingComputational BiologyData VisualizationHumansProtein Interaction MapsProteinsProtein Structure, TertiarySemanticsProteinsconvolutional neural networkdeconvolutionprotein fold recognitionvisual explanation

Identifiers

PMID33537753
PMCPMC8425391
OpenAlexW3126848411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.