Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33537673›Full record

ArticleBone & joint open2021

Prognostic factors for predicting health-related quality of life after intramedullary nailing of tibial fractures: a randomized controlled trial.

Sheila Sprague, Diane Heels-Ansdell, Sofia Bzovsky, Radovan Zdero, Mohit Bhandari, Marc Swiontkowski, Paul Tornetta, David Sanders, Emil Schemitsch, SPRINT Investigators

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bone & joint open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Looking ahead to 2021.Bone & joint open · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Sheila SpragueDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Ontario, Hamilton, Canada.
Diane Heels-AnsdellDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Ontario, Hamilton, Canada.
Sofia BzovskyDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Radovan ZderoDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, London Health Sciences Centre and Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Mohit BhandariDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Ontario, Hamilton, Canada.
Marc SwiontkowskiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minnesota, USA.
Paul TornettaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
David SandersDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, London Health Sciences Centre and Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Emil SchemitschDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, London Health Sciences Centre and Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
SPRINT Investigators
McMaster University · CALondon Health Sciences Centre · CABoston Medical Center · USImpact · CAUniversity of Minnesota · USWestern University · CA

Funding

SPRINT- Randomized Trial of Tibial Fracture FixationR01AR048529 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI SWIONTKOWSKI, MARC F · 2002 to 2006
$1.1M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR048529
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsUsing tibial shaft fracture participants from a large, multicentre randomized controlled trial, we investigated if patient and surgical factors were associated with health-related quality of life (HRQoL) at one year post-surgery.

methodsThe Study to Prospectively Evaluate Reamed Intramedullary Nails in Patients with Tibial Fractures (SPRINT) trial examined adults with an open or closed tibial shaft fracture who were treated with either reamed or unreamed intramedullary nails. HRQoL was assessed at hospital discharge (for pre-injury level) and at 12 months post-fracture using the Short Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment (SMFA) Dysfunction, SMFA Bother, 36-Item Short Form 36 (SF-36) Physical, and SF-36 Mental Component scores. We used multiple linear regression analysis to determine if baseline and surgical factors, as well as post-intervention procedures within one year of fracture, were associated with these HRQoL outcomes. Significance was set at p < 0.01. We hypothesize that, irrespective of the four measures used, prognosis is guided by both modifiable and non-modifiable factors and that patients do not return to their pre-injury level of function, nor HRQoL.

resultsFor patient and surgical factors, only pre-injury quality of life and isolated fracture showed a statistical effect on all four HRQoL outcomes, while high-energy injury mechanism, smoking, and race or ethnicity, demonstrated statistical significance for three of the four HRQoL outcomes. Patients who did not require reoperation in response to infection, the need for bone grafts, and/or the need for implant exchanges had statistically superior HRQoL outcomes than those who did require intervention within one year after initial tibial fracture nailing.

conclusionWe identified several baseline patient factors, surgical factors, and post-intervention procedures within one year after intramedullary nailing of a tibial shaft fracture that may influence a patient's HRQoL.Cite this article:

Indexed as

Health-related quality of lifeIntramedullary nailingPrognosticTibial shaftTrauma

Identifiers

PMID33537673
PMCPMC7842162
OpenAlexW3118656399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.