Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33537656›Full record

ArticleiScience2021

Establishment of murine gut microbiota in gnotobiotic mice.

Jocelyn M Choo, Geraint B Rogers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jocelyn M ChooSAHMRI Microbiome Research Laboratory, Flinders University College of Medicine and Public Health, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.
Geraint B RogersSAHMRI Microbiome Research Laboratory, Flinders University College of Medicine and Public Health, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Determining whether associations between gut microbiota characteristics and host physiology represent causal relationships is a fundamental challenge for microbiome research. We report a detailed investigation of microbiome assembly in C57BL/6 germ-free mice across a period of 70 days and compare the effects of single and multiple rounds of gavage, using both native and antibiotic-disrupted murine donor material. Recipients of the native microbiota did not achieve compositional stability until day 28 and persistent differences to donor microbiota remained until day 70. Performing multiple rounds of gavage significantly increased the cumulative number of detected taxa (mean increase: 10.4%) and compositional similarity to donor, and significantly reduced within-group variance (p < 0.05). Multiple rounds of gavage with antibiotic-disrupted microbiota provided no substantial benefit in relation to compositional similarity to donor or within-group variance. The process of donor microbiota establishment in recipient animals is necessary before experimentation commences and is considerably influenced by donor microbiota characteristics.

Indexed as

Biological SciencesMicrobiologyMicrobiome

Identifiers

PMID33537656
PMCPMC7840467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.