ArticleHRB open research2020
Exploring factors that influence the practice of Open Science by early career health researchers: a mixed methods study.
Article in HRB open research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Implementing is necessary: the gap between discourse and practice in global open science.Brazilian oral research · 2026Review
- Stakeholders' perceptions of the synergy between intellectual property and open science: A cross-sectional survey.Open research Europe · 2025Article
- Moving towards openness: introduction to the registered reports and data notes article collection.Health psychology and behavioral medicine · 2025Article
- Fostering open science and responsible research practices: A pre-post study.F1000Research · 2025Article
- Daily life in the Open Biologist's second job, as a Data Curator.Wellcome open research · 2024Article
- Demystifying Open Science in health psychology and behavioral medicine: a practical guide to Registered Reports and Data Notes.Health psychology and behavioral medicine · 2024Article
- Open Science Practices in Communication Sciences and Disorders: A Survey.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2023Article
- Assessing the publishing priorities and preferences among STEM researchers at a large R1 institution.Heliyon · 2023Article
- Machine learning hypothesis-generation for patient stratification and target discovery in rare disease: our experience with Open Science in ALS.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2023Article
- Integrating open science education into an undergraduate health professional research program.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2022Article
- Developing an open educational resource for open research: Protocol for the PaPOR TRAIL project.HRB open research · 2020Article
- Exploring factors that influence the practice of Open Science by early career health researchers: a mixed methods study.HRB open research · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.