Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33537541›Full record

ArticleResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2021

Symptomatic subsegmental versus more central pulmonary embolism: Clinical outcomes during anticoagulation.

Carmen Fernández-Capitán, Ana Rodriguez Cobo, David Jiménez, Olga Madridano, Maurizio Ciammaichella, Esther Usandizaga, Remedios Otero, Pierpaolo Di Micco, Farès Moustafa, Manuel Monreal and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Clinical significance of subsegmental pulmonary embolism: An ongoing controversy.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 11 institutions in 5 countries.

Carmen Fernández-CapitánDepartment of Internal Medicine Hospital Universitario La Paz Madrid Spain.
Ana Rodriguez CoboDepartment of Internal Medicine Hospital de Madrid Norte Sanchinarro Madrid Spain.
David JiménezRespiratory Department Ramón y Cajal Hospital and Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria IRYCIS Madrid Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4571-7721
Olga MadridanoDepartment of Internal Medicine Hospital Infanta Sofía Madrid Spain.
Maurizio CiammaichellaDepartment of Emergency Internal Medicine Ospedale St. John Rome Italy.
Esther UsandizagaDepartment of Internal Medicine Hospital de Sant Joan Despí Moises Broggi Barcelona Spain.
Remedios OteroDepartment of Pneumonology Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío Sevilla Spain.
Pierpaolo Di MiccoDepartment of Internal Medicine and Emergency Room Ospedale Buon Consiglio Fatebenefratelli Naples Italy.
Farès MoustafaDepartment of Emergency Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital Clermont-Ferrand France.
Manuel MonrealDepartment of Internal Medicine Hospital de Badalona Germans Trias i Pujol Universidad Católica de Murcia Murcia Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0494-0767
RIETE Investigators
Bayer (United States) · USHospital de Sant Joan Despí Moisès Broggi · ESHospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro · ESUniversidad Católica de Murcia · ESHospital Universitario Infanta Sofía · ESHospital Universitario La Paz · ESHospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío · ESInstituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria · ESOspedale Buon Consiglio Fatebenefratelli · ITOspedale Israelitico · ITUniversity of Clermont Auvergne · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe optimal therapy of patients with acute subsegmental pulmonary embolism (PE) is controversial.

methodsWe used the RIETE (Registro Informatizado Enfermedad TromboEmbólica) database to compare the rate of symptomatic PE recurrences during anticoagulation in patients with subsegmental, segmental, or more central PEs.

resultsAmong 15 963 patients with a first episode of symptomatic PE, 834 (5.2%) had subsegmental PE, 3797 (24%) segmental, and 11 332 (71%) more central PE. Most patients in all subgroups received initial therapy with low-molecular-weight heparin, and then most switched to vitamin K antagonists. Median duration of therapy was 179, 185, and 204 days, respectively. During anticoagulation, 183 patients developed PE recurrences, 131 developed deep vein thrombosis (DVT), 543 bled, and 1718 died (fatal PE, 135). The rate of PE recurrences was twofold higher in patients with subsegmental PE than in those with segmental (hazard ratio [HR], 2.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16-3.85) or more central PE (HR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.12-3.13). On multivariable analysis, patients with subsegmental PE had a higher risk for PE recurrences than those with central PE (adjusted HR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.02-3.03). After stratifying patients with subsegmental PE according to ultrasound imaging in the lower limbs, the rate of PE recurrences was similar in patients with DVT, in patients without DVT, and in those with no ultrasound imaging.

conclusionsOur study reveals that the risk for PE recurrences in patients with segmental PE is not lower than in those with more central PE, thus suggesting that the risk of PE recurrences is not influenced by the anatomic location of PE.

Indexed as

anticoagulantdeep vein thrombosisoutcomespulmonary embolismsubsegmental

Identifiers

PMID33537541
PMCPMC7845079
OpenAlexW3107218470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.