Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33537511›Full record

ArticleTobacco prevention & cessation2021

Smokers' and non-smokers' secondhand smoke experiences and interactions to reduce exposure in Armenia and Georgia.

Arusyak Harutyunyan, Varduhi Hayrumyan, Zhanna Sargsyan, Arevik Torosyan, Ana Dekanosidze, Michelle Kegler, Lela Sturua, Carla J Berg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tobacco prevention & cessation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Arusyak HarutyunyanTurpanjian School of Public Health, American University of Armenia, Yerevan, Armenia.
Varduhi HayrumyanTurpanjian School of Public Health, American University of Armenia, Yerevan, Armenia.
Zhanna SargsyanTurpanjian School of Public Health, American University of Armenia, Yerevan, Armenia.
Arevik TorosyanNational Institute of Health named after academician S. Avdalbekyan, Ministry of Health, Yerevan, Armenia.
Ana DekanosidzeGeorgia National Center for Disease Control and Public Health, Tbilisi, Georgia.
Michelle KeglerDepartment of Behavioral Sciences and Health Education, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, United States.
Lela SturuaGeorgia National Center for Disease Control and Public Health, Tbilisi, Georgia.
Carla J BergDepartment of Prevention and Community Health, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, United States.

Funding

Pilot Project ProgramP30ES019776 · NIEHS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Carmen Joseph Marsit · 2013 to 2026
$22.6M
Smoke-free Air Coalitions in Georgia and Armenia: A Community Randomized TrialR01TW010664 · FIC · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI BERG, CARLA J, KEGLER, MICHELLE C · 2017 to 2021
$1.5M
Emory-Georgia Clean Air Research & Education (CARE) ProgramD43ES030927 · NIEHS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI BERG, CARLA J, CAUDLE, WILLIAM MICHAEL · 2019 to 2025
$1.2M
FIC NIH HHS R01 TW010664NIEHS NIH HHS D43 ES030927NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES019776
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionArmenia and Georgia have high rates of smoking and secondhand smoke exposure (SHSe). Greater progress in recent smoke-free legislation in Georgia and Armenia provides a pivotal time for examining the impact on smokers' and non-smokers' experiences and interactions regarding SHSe.

methodsSurveys were conducted in 28 communities in Armenia (n=705) and Georgia (n=751) in 2018 and assessed past 30-day SHSe and smoking in different contexts, as well as attitudes toward and interactions regarding SHSe.

resultsIn this sample (mean age 43.4 years, SD=13.5; 60.5% female; 27.3% smokers), SHSe among non-smokers was usually in homes (42.7%), cars (42.4%), and outdoor public places (38.2%); smokers also reported smoking usually in these places (70.0%, 62.1%, and 60.0%, respectively). Smokers indicated greater likelihood of putting out cigarettes and non-smokers indicated greater likelihood of asking smokers to put them out in places where smoking was prohibited versus allowed (76.5% vs 57.3%, and 46.6% vs 30.7%, respectively). Moreover, 89.9% of smokers indicated being very likely to put out cigarettes around small children if asked and 75.8% indicated trying to minimize SHSe. While 39.7% of participants reported seeing requests to smokers to put out cigarettes in the past 6 months, only 23.3% of smokers reported being asked to do so. Non-smokers in Georgia versus Armenia reported greater likelihood of engaging in behaviors to lower SHSe (p<0.001).

conclusionsSmoke-free legislation may catalyze more behaviors to lower SHSe, particularly among non-smokers; however, private settings (e.g. homes) remain prominent SHSe sources. Public health efforts must consider implications of such policies on SHSe in private settings.

Indexed as

low- and middle-income countriessecondhand smokesmoke-free air policiessocial normstobacco control

Identifiers

PMID33537511
PMCPMC7845734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.