Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33537502›Full record

ReviewJournal of the anus, rectum and colon2021

Japanese Practice Guidelines for Fecal Incontinence Part 2-Examination and Conservative Treatment for Fecal Incontinence- English Version.

Kotaro Maeda, Toshiki Mimura, Kazuhiko Yoshioka, Mihoko Seki, Hidetoshi Katsuno, Yoshihiko Takao, Akira Tsunoda, Tetsuo Yamana, Fecal Incontinence Guideline Preparation Committee

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the anus, rectum and colon, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Management of fecal incontinence: what specialists need to know?Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Kotaro MaedaInternational Medical Center Fujita Health University Hospital, Toyoake, Japan.
Toshiki MimuraDepartment of Surgery, Jichi Medical University, Tochigi, Japan.
Kazuhiko YoshiokaDepartment of Surgery, Kansai Medical University Medical Center, Osaka, Japan.
Mihoko SekiNursing Division, Tokyo Yamate Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Hidetoshi KatsunoDepartment of Surgery, Fujita Health University Okazaki Medical Center, Okazaki, Japan.
Yoshihiko TakaoDivision of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Sanno Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Akira TsunodaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kameda Medical Center, Kamogawa, Japan.
Tetsuo YamanaDepartment of Coloproctology, Tokyo Yamate Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Fecal Incontinence Guideline Preparation Committee
Tokyo Yamate Medical Center · JPFujita Health University Hospital · JPFujita Health University Okazaki Medical CenterJichi Medical University Hospital · JPKameda Medical Center · JPKansai Medical University · JPSanno Medical Center · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Examination for fecal incontinence is performed in order to evaluate the condition of each patient. As there is no single method that perfectly assesses this condition, there are several tests that need to be conducted. These are as follows: anal manometry, recto anal sensitivity test, pudendal nerve terminal motor latency, electromyogram, anal endosonography, pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan, and defecography. In addition, the mental and physical stress most patients experience during all these examinations needs to be taken into consideration. Although some of these examinations mostly apply for patients with constipation, we hereby describe these tests as tools for the assessment of fecal incontinence. Conservative therapies for fecal incontinence include diet, lifestyle, and bowel habit modification, pharmacotherapy, pelvic floor muscle training, biofeedback therapy, anal insert device, trans anal irrigation, and so on. These interventions have been identified to improve the symptoms of fecal incontinence by determining the mechanisms resulting in firmer stool consistency; strengthening the pelvic floor muscles, including the external anal sphincter; normalizing the rectal sensation; or periodic emptying of the colon and rectum. Among these interventions, diet, lifestyle, and bowel habit modifications and pharmacotherapy can be performed with some degree of knowledge and experience. These two therapies, therefore, can be conducted by all physicians, including general practitioners and other physicians not specializing in fecal incontinence. However, patients with fecal incontinence who did not improve following these initial therapies should be referred to specialized institutions. Contrary to the initial therapies, specialized therapies, including pelvic floor muscle training, biofeedback therapy, anal insert device, and trans anal irrigation, should be conducted in specialized institutions as these require patient education and instructions based on expert knowledge and experience. In general, conservative therapies should be performed for fecal incontinence before surgery because its pathophysiologies are mostly attributed to benign conditions. All Japanese healthcare professionals who take care of patients with fecal incontinence are expected to understand the characteristics of each conservative therapy, so that appropriate therapies will be selected and performed. Therefore, in this chapter, the characteristics of each conservative therapy for fecal incontinence are described.

Indexed as

conservative treatmentsdefecation disordersexaminationfecal incontinenceJapanese practice guidelinespractice guideline

Identifiers

PMID33537502
PMCPMC7843146
OpenAlexW3123114821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.