ArticleJournal of the anus, rectum and colon2021
A Novel Surgical Technique for Anal Fistula Surgery Designed to Preserve the Anal Sphincter Function and Anoderm.
Article in Journal of the anus, rectum and colon, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Use of Non-Thermal Plasma as Postoperative Therapy in Anal Fistula: Clinical Experience and Results.Biomedicines · 2024Article
- Surgical effect and gastrointestinal functional recovery of laparoscopic-guided total mesorectal excision in patients with rectal cancer.Journal of minimal access surgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesWe reviewed surgical outcomes after introducing a novel surgical technique for anal fistula surgery designed to preserve anal sphincter function and the anoderm.
methodsWe studied 200 male patients who underwent a functional preservative operative technique (FPOT group) for anal fistulas and 200 patients who underwent resection of trans-sphincteric anal fistulas (fistulectomy group) between February 2014 and September 2015. We compared complications, such as those affecting anal sphincter function, recurrence, and incontinence.
resultsFistulas recurred in three (1.5%) patients in the FPOT group and two (1%) patients in the fistulectomy group. This difference was not significant. Other complications included gas leakage and other forms of incontinence in 1 (0.5%) and 14 (7%) patients in the FPOT and fistulectomy groups, respectively. Anal function assessment demonstrated that the FPOT was significantly better at preserving function than fistulectomy in all patients.
conclusionsThere were no significant differences between the FPOT and fistulectomy in terms of recurrence or complication rates. Also, because there was no decrease in postoperative anal function, we concluded that the FPOT is an effective preservative surgical technique for treating trans-sphincteric anal fistulas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.