Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33537236›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2020

Rationale for Involved Field Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy-Enhanced Intermittent Androgen Deprivation Therapy in Hormone-Sensitive Nodal Oligo-Recurrent Prostate Cancer Following Prostate Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy.

Michael Carrasquilla, Michael L Creswell, Abigail N Pepin, Edina Wang, Matthew Forsthoefel, Mary McGunigal, Elizabeth Bullock, Siyuan Lei, Brian T Collins, Jonathan W Lischalk and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Michael CarrasquillaDepartment of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States.
Michael L CreswellGeorgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, United States.
Abigail N PepinGeorge Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, United States.
Edina WangDepartment of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States.
Matthew ForsthoefelDepartment of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States.
Mary McGunigalDepartment of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States.
Elizabeth BullockDepartment of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States.
Siyuan LeiDepartment of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States.
Brian T CollinsDepartment of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States.
Jonathan W LischalkDepartment of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States.
Giuseppe EspositoDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States.
Nima AghdamDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States.
Deepak KumarBiotechnology Research Institute, North Carolina Central University, Durham, NC, United States.
Simeng SuyDepartment of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States.
Paul LegerDepartment of Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, United States.
Ryan A HankinsDepartment of Urology, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States.
Nancy A DawsonDepartment of Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, United States.
Sean P CollinsDepartment of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States.
Georgetown University · USGeorgetown University Medical Center · USBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USGeorge Washington University · USNorth Carolina Central University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lymph node recurrent prostate cancer is a common clinical scenario that is likely to increase significantly with the widespread adoption of novel positron emission tomography (PET) agents. Despite increasing evidence that localized therapy is disease modifying, most men with lymph node recurrent prostate cancer receive only systemic therapy with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). For men who receive localized therapy the intent is often to delay receipt of systemic therapy. Little evidence exists on the optimal combination of local and systemic therapy in this patient population. In this hypothesis generating review, we will outline the rationale and propose a framework for combining involved field SBRT with risk adapted intermittent ADT for hormone sensitive nodal recurrent prostate cancer. In patients with a limited number of nodal metastases, involved field stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) may have a role in eliminating castrate-resistant clones and possibly prolonging the response to intermittent ADT. We hypothesize that in a small percentage of patients, such a treatment approach may lead to long term remission or cure.

Indexed as

hormone sensitiveintermittent ADTinvolved field SBRTNodal Oligo-recurrenceprostate cancerprostate SBRT

Identifiers

PMID33537236
PMCPMC7848164
OpenAlexW3125339686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.