ReviewJournal of the advanced practitioner in oncology
Optimizing Use of Newly Approved Agents for Acute Myeloid Leukemia.
Review in Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diagnosis-Driven Targeted Therapy in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Clinical Integration of Tyrosine Kinase, BCL-2, and CD33-Directed Strategies with Midostaurin, Venetoclax, and Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Targeted and epigenetic therapies for acute myeloid leukemia treatment.Discover oncology · 2025Review
- Targeting Acute Myeloid Leukemia with 1,2,4-triazolo[4,3-b]pyridazine derivatives: a molecular docking, dynamics, and ADMET approach.In silico pharmacology · 2025Article
- Neuroprotective Effects of Chemical Constituents of Leaves ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Antimicrobial, Cytotoxic, and Anti-Inflammatory Activities ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Molecular and epigenetic alterations in normal and malignant myelopoiesis in human leukemia 60 (HL60) promyelocytic cell line model.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Until recently, treatment advances in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) had been slow since the 1970s. However, in the past few years, as the understanding of the pathophysiology of AML has advanced, numerous treatments have been approved by the U.S. Food & Drug Administration. This article reviews the mechanisms of action, indications, and clinical trial details for eight novel agents, as well as the current discussions surrounding monitoring minimal residual disease.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.