ArticleEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority2021
Update of the list of QPS-recommended biological agents intentionally added to food or feed as notified to EFSA 13: suitability of taxonomic units notified to EFSA until September 2020.
Article in EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed.
- The therapeutic potential ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- Strain-Specific Safety Evaluation ofFood science & nutrition · 2025Article
- Water-Mediated Dissemination and Detection of Antibiotic Resistance Across Livestock, Agri-Food, and Aquaculture Systems.Micromachines · 2025Review
- Assessment of safety:Toxicology reports · 2024Article
- Isolation of Lactic Acid Bacteria (LAB) from Salmonids for Potential Use as Probiotics:Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- Article
- Emerging Postharvest Technologies to Enhance the Shelf-Life of Fruit and Vegetables: An Overview.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Considerations for determining safety of probiotics: A USP perspective.Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP · 2022Review
- Review
- Safety and efficacy of a feed additive consisting of riboflavin-5'-phosphate ester monosodium salt (vitamin BEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2022Article
- Probiotics in the Management of Mental and Gastrointestinal Post-COVID Symptomes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Safety and efficacy of a feed additive consisting ofEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2022Article
- Safety and efficacy of a feed additive consisting of 6-phytase (produced byEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2022Article
- Safety and Technological Characterization ofJournal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2022Article
- Safety and efficacy of a feed additive consisting of l-methionine produced by the combined activities ofEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2022Article
- Lactobacilli Infection Case Reports in the Last Three Years and Safety Implications.Nutrients · 2022Review
- Safety and efficacy of the feed additive consisting ofEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2022Article
- Draft Genome Sequence ofMicroorganisms · 2022Article
- Safety and efficacy of a feed additive consisting of astaxanthin-richEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2022Article
- Wildlife Symbiotic Bacteria Are Indicators of the Health Status of the Host and Its Ecosystem.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
28 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The qualified presumption of safety (QPS) approach was developed to provide a regularly updated generic pre-evaluation of the safety of biological agents, intended for addition to food or feed, to support the work of EFSA's Scientific Panels. It is based on an assessment of published data for each agent, with respect to its taxonomic identity, the body of knowledge, safety concerns and antimicrobial resistance. Safety concerns identified for a taxonomic unit (TU) are, where possible, confirmed at strain or product level, and reflected by 'qualifications'. In the period covered by this statement, no new information was found that would change the status of previously recommended QPS TUs. Of the 36 microorganisms notified to EFSA between April and September 2020, 33 were excluded; seven filamentous fungi (including
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.