Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33536686›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of ecology2021

Unraveling the relative role of light and water competition between lianas and trees in tropical forests: A vegetation model analysis.

Félicien Meunier, Hans Verbeeck, Betsy Cowdery, Stefan A Schnitzer, Chris M Smith-Martin, Jennifer S Powers, Xiangtao Xu, Martijn Slot, Hannes P T De Deurwaerder, Matteo Detto and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of ecology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Linking physiology, epidemiology, and demography: Understanding how lianas outcompete trees in a changing world.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Félicien MeunierComputational and Applied Vegetation Ecology Department of Environment Ghent University Ghent Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2486-309X
Hans VerbeeckComputational and Applied Vegetation Ecology Department of Environment Ghent University Ghent Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1490-0168
Betsy CowderyDepartment of Earth and Environment Boston University Boston MA USA.
Stefan A SchnitzerSmithsonian Tropical Research Institute Apartado Panama.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2715-9455
Chris M Smith-MartinDepartment of Ecology, Evolution and Evolutionary Biology Columbia University New York NY USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6557-1432
Jennifer S PowersSmithsonian Tropical Research Institute Apartado Panama.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3451-4803
Xiangtao XuDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Cornell University Ithaca NY USA.
Martijn SlotSmithsonian Tropical Research Institute Apartado Panama.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5558-1792
Hannes P T De DeurwaerderComputational and Applied Vegetation Ecology Department of Environment Ghent University Ghent Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9287-2062
Matteo DettoSmithsonian Tropical Research Institute Apartado Panama.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0494-188X
Damien BonalUniversité de Lorraine AgroParisTech INRAE UMR Silva Nancy France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9602-8603
Marcos LongoJet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena CA USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5062-6245
Louis S SantiagoSmithsonian Tropical Research Institute Apartado Panama.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5994-6122
Michael DietzeDepartment of Earth and Environment Boston University Boston MA USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2324-2518

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite their low contribution to forest carbon stocks, lianas (woody vines) play an important role in the carbon dynamics of tropical forests. As structural parasites, they hinder tree survival, growth and fecundity; hence, they negatively impact net ecosystem productivity and long-term carbon sequestration.Competition (for water and light) drives various forest processes and depends on the local abundance of resources over time. However, evaluating the relative role of resource availability on the interactions between lianas and trees from empirical observations is particularly challenging. Previous approaches have used labour-intensive and ecosystem-scale manipulation experiments, which are infeasible in most situations.We propose to circumvent this challenge by evaluating the uncertainty of water and light capture processes of a process-based vegetation model (ED2) including the liana growth form. We further developed the liana plant functional type in ED2 to mechanistically simulate water uptake and transport from roots to leaves, and start the model from prescribed initial conditions. We then used the PEcAn bioinformatics platform to constrain liana parameters and run uncertainty analyses.Baseline runs successfully reproduced ecosystem gas exchange fluxes (gross primary productivity and latent heat) and forest structural features (leaf area index, aboveground biomass) in two sites (Barro Colorado Island, Panama and Paracou, French Guiana) characterized by different rainfall regimes and levels of liana abundance.Model uncertainty analyses revealed that water limitation was the factor driving the competition between trees and lianas at the drier site (BCI), and during the relatively short dry season of the wetter site (Paracou). In young patches, light competition dominated in Paracou but alternated with water competition between the wet and the dry season on BCI according to the model simulations.The modelling workflow also identified key liana traits (photosynthetic quantum efficiency, stomatal regulation parameters, allometric relationships) and processes (water use, respiration, climbing) driving the model uncertainty. They should be considered as priorities for future data acquisition and model development to improve predictions of the carbon dynamics of liana-infested forests.

Indexed as

competition for resourcesdynamic global vegetation modelecosystem demography modellianasPEcAnplant–plant interactionsuncertainty analysis

Identifiers

PMID33536686
PMCPMC7839527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.