Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33536649›Full record

ReviewNature2021

Developing fibrillated cellulose as a sustainable technological material.

Tian Li, Chaoji Chen, Alexandra H Brozena, J Y Zhu, Lixian Xu, Carlos Driemeier, Jiaqi Dai, Orlando J Rojas, Akira Isogai, Lars Wågberg and 1 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 219 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
219citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

219 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Biosynthesis of Spatially Differentiated Cellulose for Flexible All-in-one Supercapacitors.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Advances in Cellulose-Based Materials for Bionic Sensors.Macromolecular rapid communications · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Janus-Type Electrostatic Potential Gradient-Activated Dynamic ZnAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

159 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Tian Li *Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1087-0662
Chaoji Chen *Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9553-554X
Alexandra H BrozenaDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5045-2123
J Y ZhuUSDA Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, WI, USA.
Lixian XuSappi Biotech, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Carlos DriemeierBrazilian Biorenewables National Laboratory (LNBR), Brazilian Center for Research in Energy and Materials (CNPEM), Campinas, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4794-3714
Jiaqi DaiInventwood LLC, College Park, MD, USA.
Orlando J RojasBioproducts Institute, Departments of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Chemistry and Wood Science, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4036-4020
Akira IsogaiGraduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Lars WågbergDepartment of Fibre and Polymer Technology and Wallenberg Wood Science Centre, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
Liangbing HuDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA. binghu@umd.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9456-9315

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cellulose is the most abundant biopolymer on Earth, found in trees, waste from agricultural crops and other biomass. The fibres that comprise cellulose can be broken down into building blocks, known as fibrillated cellulose, of varying, controllable dimensions that extend to the nanoscale. Fibrillated cellulose is harvested from renewable resources, so its sustainability potential combined with its other functional properties (mechanical, optical, thermal and fluidic, for example) gives this nanomaterial unique technological appeal. Here we explore the use of fibrillated cellulose in the fabrication of materials ranging from composites and macrofibres, to thin films, porous membranes and gels. We discuss research directions for the practical exploitation of these structures and the remaining challenges to overcome before fibrillated cellulose materials can reach their full potential. Finally, we highlight some key issues towards successful manufacturing scale-up of this family of materials.

Indexed as

Biocompatible MaterialsBiotechnologyCelluloseGelsHumansNanostructuresPorositySustainable DevelopmentBiocompatible MaterialsCelluloseGels

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.