Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33536591›Full record

ReviewEye (London, England)2021

Sub-Tenon's anaesthesia for modern eye surgery-clinicians' perspective, 30 years after re-introduction.

Matthew J Chua, Friedrich Lersch, Alfred W Y Chua, Chandra M Kumar, Tom Eke

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Eye (London, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Long-Acting Ocular Injectables: Are We Looking In The Right Direction?Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Matthew J ChuaDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Nepean Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3695-2620
Friedrich LerschDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Treatment, Inselspital/Universitary Hospital, Bern, Switzerland.
Alfred W Y ChuaDepartment of Anaesthesia, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Chandra M KumarDepartment of Anaesthesia, Khoo Teck Puat Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5868-6004
Tom EkeDepartment of Ophthalmology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, UK. tom.eke@nnuh.nhs.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7789-3618
Khoo Teck Puat Hospital · SGNepean Hospital · AUNorfolk and Norwich University Hospital · GBRoyal Prince Alfred Hospital · AUUniversity Hospital of Bern · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sub-Tenon's block (STB) is a good technique of local anaesthesia for many types of eye surgery. It has a relatively good risk profile, in that sight- and life-threatening complications appear to be extremely rare. STB has gained popularity in the last three decades, with refinements including different types of blunt metal cannula, plastic cannulae and 'incisionless' approaches. Usage of STB varies significantly across the globe. This narrative review documents the historical evolution of STB techniques, anatomical and physiological considerations, its utility and suitability, complications, explores the current practice and possible future applications.

Indexed as

Anesthesia, LocalAnesthetics, LocalCannulaHumansOphthalmologic Surgical ProceduresAnesthetics, Local

Identifiers

PMID33536591
PMCPMC8182827
OpenAlexW3126740424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.