ArticleAging2021
Comprehensive analysis of prognostic immune-related genes in the tumor microenvironment of colorectal cancer.
Article in Aging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of colorectal cancer stem cells on the development and metastasis of colorectal cancer.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2024Review
- Identification of gene biomarkers and immune cell infiltration characteristics in rectal cancer.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, we used the ESTIMATE algorithm to analyze clinical data and transcriptome profiles of 1635 colorectal cancer (CRC) samples from the Gene Expression Omnibus and The Cancer Genome Atlas databases and identify prognostic immune-related genes (IRGs). We identified 941 differentially expressed (4 downregulated and 937 upregulated) genes by comparing samples with high and low immune, stromal scores and tumor purity. LASSO Cox regression analyses showed that the risk score based on a ten-IRG signature was an independent prognostic factor in CRC. The nomogram with pathological stages (TNM) and the ten-IRG signature showed a C-index of 0.769 (95% CI, 0.717-0.821), and area under ROC curve values of 0.788, 0.782 and 0.789 for 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS, respectively. TIMER database analysis showed positive correlation between the ten prognostic IRGs and the levels of tumor-infiltrated immune cells, including CD4
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.