Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33536344›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2021

Comparative analysis of embryo proper and suspensor transcriptomes in plant embryos with different morphologies.

Min Chen, Jer-Young Lin, Xiaomeng Wu, Nestor R Apuya, Kelli F Henry, Brandon H Le, Anhthu Q Bui, Julie M Pelletier, Shawn Cokus, Matteo Pellegrini and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Methods of In Situ Quantitative Root Biology.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  9. Transcriptomes and DNA methylomes in apomictic cells delineate nucellar embryogenesis initiation in citrus.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Min ChenDepartment of Molecular, Cell, and Developmental Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095.
Jer-Young LinDepartment of Molecular, Cell, and Developmental Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095.
Xiaomeng WuDepartment of Molecular, Cell, and Developmental Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095.ORCID 0000-0001-5798-5734
Nestor R ApuyaDepartment of Molecular, Cell, and Developmental Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095.ORCID 0000-0001-8161-6488
Kelli F HenryDepartment of Molecular, Cell, and Developmental Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095.ORCID 0000-0001-7633-9981
Brandon H LeDepartment of Molecular, Cell, and Developmental Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095.ORCID 0000-0001-8651-2186
Anhthu Q BuiDepartment of Molecular, Cell, and Developmental Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095.
Julie M PelletierDepartment of Plant Biology, College of Biological Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA 95616.
Shawn CokusDepartment of Molecular, Cell, and Developmental Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095.
Matteo PellegriniDepartment of Molecular, Cell, and Developmental Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095.ORCID 0000-0001-9355-9564
John J HaradaDepartment of Plant Biology, College of Biological Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA 95616.ORCID 0000-0003-1438-7296
Robert B GoldbergDepartment of Molecular, Cell, and Developmental Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095; bobg@g.ucla.edu.
University of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of California, Davis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An important question is what genes govern the differentiation of plant embryos into suspensor and embryo proper regions following fertilization and division of the zygote. We compared embryo proper and suspensor transcriptomes of four plants that vary in embryo morphology within the suspensor region. We determined that genes encoding enzymes in several metabolic pathways leading to the formation of hormones, such as gibberellic acid, and other metabolites are up-regulated in giant scarlet runner bean and common bean suspensors. Genes involved in transport and Golgi body organization are up-regulated within the suspensors of these plants as well, strengthening the view that giant specialized suspensors serve as a hormone factory and a conduit for transferring substances to the developing embryo proper. By contrast, genes controlling transcriptional regulation, development, and cell division are up-regulated primarily within the embryo proper. Transcriptomes from less specialized soybean and

Indexed as

ArabidopsisCell DivisionGene Expression Regulation, PlantGibberellinsGlycine maxPlant DevelopmentPlant ProteinsSeedsTranscriptomegibberellic acidGibberellinsPlant ProteinsChIP-Seqembryo properlaser capture microdissectionsuspensortranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID33536344
PMCPMC8017943
OpenAlexW3128958617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.