Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33536318›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

How many people will need palliative care in Scotland by 2040? A mixed-method study of projected palliative care need and recommendations for service delivery.

Anne M Finucane, Anna E Bone, Simon Etkind, David Carr, Richard Meade, Rosalia Munoz-Arroyo, Sébastien Moine, Aghimien Iyayi-Igbinovia, Catherine J Evans, Irene J Higginson and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Challenges to timely access to out-of-hours end-of-life medications: a qualitative study in UK primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Anne M FinucaneResearch, Marie Curie Hospice Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK anne.finucane@mariecurie.org.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-3056-059X
Anna E BoneCicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, UK.
Simon EtkindCicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, UK.
David CarrPublic Health Scotland, Glasgow, UK.
Richard MeadePolicy and Public Affairs, Marie Curie, Edinburgh, UK.
Rosalia Munoz-ArroyoPublic Health Scotland, Glasgow, UK.
Sébastien MoinePrimary Palliative Care Research Group, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Aghimien Iyayi-IgbinoviaPublic Health Scotland, Glasgow, UK.
Catherine J EvansCicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, UK.
Irene J HigginsonCicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, UK.
Scott A MurrayPrimary Palliative Care Research Group, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6649-9428

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo estimate future palliative care need and complexity of need in Scotland, and to identify priorities for future service delivery.

designWe estimated the prevalence of palliative care need by analysing the proportion of deaths from defined chronic progressive illnesses. We described linear projections up to 2040 using national death registry data and official mortality forecasts. An expert consultation and subsequent online consensus survey generated recommendations on meeting future palliative care need.

settingScotland, population of 5.4 million.

participantsAll decedents in Scotland over 11 years (2007 to 2017). The consultation had 34 participants; 24 completed the consensus survey. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES: Estimates of past and future palliative care need in Scotland from 2007 up to 2040. Multimorbidity was operationalised as two or more registered causes of death from different disease groups (cancer, organ failure, dementia, other). Consultation and survey data were analysed descriptively.

resultsWe project that by 2040, the number of people requiring palliative care will increase by at least 14%; and by 20% if we factor in multimorbidity. The number of people dying from multiple diseases associated with different disease groups is projected to increase from 27% of all deaths in 2017 to 43% by 2040. To address increased need and complexity, experts prioritised sustained investment in a national digital platform, roll-out of integrated electronic health and social care records; and approaches that remain person-centred.

conclusionsBy 2040 more people in Scotland are projected to die with palliative care needs, and the complexity of need will increase markedly. Service delivery models must adapt to serve growing demand and complexity associated with dying from multiple diseases from different disease groups. We need sustained investment in secure, accessible, integrated and person-centred health and social care digital systems, to improve care coordination and optimise palliative care for people across care settings.

Indexed as

Chronic DiseaseDelivery of Health CareForecastingHumansNeoplasmsPalliative CareScotlandadult palliative caredementiageriatric medicinehealth policypublic health

Identifiers

PMID33536318
PMCPMC7868264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.