Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33536262›Full record

SynthesisEuropean respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society2021

Systematic review and meta-analysis of residential radon and lung cancer in never-smokers.

Elvin S Cheng, Sam Egger, Suzanne Hughes, Marianne Weber, Julia Steinberg, Bayzidur Rahman, Heather Worth, Alberto Ruano-Ravina, Patrick Rawstorne, Xue Qin Yu

Open access · diamondAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Urinary Metabolite Diagnostic and Prognostic Liquid Biopsy Biomarkers of Lung Cancer in Nonsmokers and Tobacco Smokers.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2024
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Occupational Benzene Exposure: An Unrecognized Threat for Lung Cancer Development.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2024
    Article
  18. Lung cancer burden and trends from 2000 to 2018 in China: Comparison between China and the United States.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Elvin S ChengCancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, Australia elvin.cheng@nswcc.org.au.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0021-196X
Sam EggerCancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, Australia.
Suzanne HughesCancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, Australia.
Marianne WeberCancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, Australia.
Julia SteinbergCancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0585-2312
Bayzidur RahmanSchool of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Heather WorthSchool of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Alberto Ruano-RavinaDept of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9927-7453
Patrick RawstorneSchool of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Xue Qin YuCancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, Australia.
The University of Sydney · AUUNSW Sydney · AUUniversidade de Santiago de Compostela · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlobally, radon is the leading risk factor for lung cancer in never-smokers (LCINS). In this study, we systematically reviewed and meta-analysed the evidence of the risk of LCINS associated with residential radon exposure.

methodsMedline and Embase databases were searched using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria to identify relevant studies published from 1 January 1990 to 5 March 2020 focused on never-smokers. We identified four pooled collaborative studies (incorporating data from 24 case-control studies), one case-control study and one cohort study for systematic review. Meta-analysis was performed on the results of the four pooled studies due to different measures of effect and outcome reported in the cohort study and insufficient information reported for the case-control study. In a

resultsRisk estimates of lung cancer from residential radon exposure were pooled in the meta-analysis for 2341 never-smoker cases, 8967 never-smoker controls, 9937 ever-smoker cases and 12 463 ever-smoker controls. Adjusted excess relative risks (aERRs) per 100 Bq·m

conclusionThis study provided quantified risk estimates for lung cancer from residential radon exposure among both never-smokers and ever-smokers. Among never-smokers in radon-prone areas, men were at higher risk of lung cancer than women.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsRadonCase-Control StudiesCohort StudiesEnvironmental ExposureFemaleHumansMaleRisk FactorsSmokersRadon

Identifiers

PMID33536262
PMCPMC9488946
OpenAlexW3126930341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.