Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33536117›Full record

ArticleDeutsches Arzteblatt international2021

Routine Molecular Pathology Diagnostics in Precision Oncology.

Carina Wenzel, Sylvia Herold, Martin Wermke, Daniela E Aust, Gustavo B Baretton

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Carina Wenzel
Sylvia Herold
Martin Wermke
Daniela E Aust
Gustavo B Baretton

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTechnical advances in the field of molecular genetics permit precise genomic characterization of malignant tumors. This has not only improved our understanding of tumor biology but also paved the way for molecularly stratified treatment strategies in routine clinical practice.

methodsA selective search of PubMed to identify literature on molecular pathology methods, their indications, the challenges associated with molecular findings, and future developments.

resultsTumors can be characterized with the aid of immunohistochemistry, in-situ hybridization, and sequencing of DNA or RNA. The benefits of molecularly stratified tumor treatment have been demonstrated by randomized clinical trials on numerous tumor entities, e.g., non-small-cell lung cancer, colorectal cancer, and breast cancer. Therefore, initiation of specific treatment for these entities should be preceded by molecular pathology biomarker analyses, generally carried out on tumor tissue. Randomized controlled trials and non-controlled studies show that enhanced progression-free survival ensues if the pharmacological treatment is oriented on the findings of molecular pathology diagnostics. In next-generation sequencing, numerous relevant gene sequences or even whole genes can be sequenced in parallel, dispensing with complex staged diagnostics and reducing the use of biomaterials. These new methods also complement the currently relevant predictive biomarkers by permitting the investigation of genetic alterations presently of interest in the context of clinical studies. Prior to widespread routine clinical application, however, sequencing of large gene panels or whole genomes or exomes need to be even more stringently validated.

conclusionQuality-assured molecular pathology assays are universally available for the determination of currently relevant predictive biomarkers. However, the integration of extensive genomic analyses into routine molecular pathology diagnostics represents a future challenge in precision oncology.

Identifiers

PMID33536117
PMCPMC8287073
OpenAlexW3126741435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.