Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33536045›Full record

ArticleClinical epigenetics2021

Genome-wide DNA methylation dynamics during epigenetic reprogramming in the porcine germline.

Isabel Gómez-Redondo, Benjamín Planells, Sebastián Cánovas, Elena Ivanova, Gavin Kelsey, Alfonso Gutiérrez-Adán

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical epigenetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. The epigenome of male germ cells and the programming of phenotypes in cattle.Animal frontiers : the review magazine of animal agriculture · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Isabel Gómez-Redondo *Department of Animal Reproduction, INIA, Madrid, Spain. igomer00@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-9319-7580
Benjamín Planells *Department of Animal Reproduction, INIA, Madrid, Spain.
Sebastián CánovasPhysiology of Reproduction Group, Department of Physiology, Universidad de Murcia, Campus Mare Nostrum, Murcia, Spain.
Elena IvanovaEpigenetics Programme, The Babraham Institute, Cambridge, UK.
Gavin KelseyEpigenetics Programme, The Babraham Institute, Cambridge, UK.
Alfonso Gutiérrez-AdánDepartment of Animal Reproduction, INIA, Madrid, Spain.
Babraham Institute · GBCentro Regional de Selección y Reproducción Animal · ESInstituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrior work in mice has shown that some retrotransposed elements remain substantially methylated during DNA methylation reprogramming of germ cells. In the pig, however, information about this process is scarce. The present study was designed to examine the methylation profiles of porcine germ cells during the time course of epigenetic reprogramming.

resultsSows were artificially inseminated, and their fetuses were collected 28, 32, 36, 39, and 42 days later. At each time point, genital ridges were dissected from the mesonephros and germ cells were isolated through magnetic-activated cell sorting using an anti-SSEA-1 antibody, and recovered germ cells were subjected to whole-genome bisulphite sequencing. Methylation levels were quantified using SeqMonk software by performing an unbiased analysis, and persistently methylated regions (PMRs) in each sex were determined to extract those regions showing 50% or more methylation. Most genomic elements underwent a dramatic loss of methylation from day 28 to day 36, when the lowest levels were shown. By day 42, there was evidence for the initiation of genomic re-methylation. We identified a total of 1456 and 1122 PMRs in male and female germ cells, respectively, and large numbers of transposable elements (SINEs, LINEs, and LTRs) were found to be located within these PMRs. Twenty-one percent of the introns located in these PMRs were found to be the first introns of a gene, suggesting their regulatory role in the expression of these genes. Interestingly, most of the identified PMRs were demethylated at the blastocyst stage.

conclusionsOur findings indicate that methylation reprogramming in pig germ cells follows the general dynamics shown in mice and human, unveiling genomic elements that behave differently between male and female germ cells.

Indexed as

AnimalsBlastocystCellular ReprogrammingDNA MethylationEpigenomicsFemaleFetusGenome-Wide Association StudyGenomic ImprintingGerm CellsHumansIntronsLong Interspersed Nucleotide ElementsMaleMiceShort Interspersed Nucleotide ElementsEmbryoMethylation reprogrammingPrimordial germ cellsWhole-genome bisulphite sequencing

Identifiers

PMID33536045
PMCPMC7860200
OpenAlexW3128061691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.