ReviewBMC urology2021
Splenogonadal fusion: a case report and review of the literature.
Review in BMC urology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Splenogonadal Fusion With Polysplenia Discovered During Pediatric Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Case Report.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
- Double Torsion of a Continuous Type of a Splenogonadal Fusion Presenting as an Inguinoscrotal Emergency: A Rare Case Report.International medical case reports journal · 2026Article
- Discontinuous Splenogonadal Fusion: A Case Report.Cureus · 2025Article
- A rare incidental finding of splenogonadal fusion in a trauma patient: A case report and review of the literature.Radiology case reports · 2025Article
- Continuous Splenogonadal Fusion Diagnosed by Laparoscopy in a Child With a Communicating Hydrocele.Cureus · 2024Article
- Article
- Gastric Outlet Obstruction from Stomach-Containing Groin Hernias: Case Report and a Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Splenogonadal fusion: a case report.Journal of medical case reports · 2023Article
- Female splenogonadal fusion: A PLEA for conservative management.Urology case reports · 2023Article
- The continuous type of splenogonadal fusion: A rare case report and literature review.International journal of surgery case reports · 2023Article
- A case of splenogonadal fusion in the left testis.Clinical case reports · 2023Article
- Seminoma arising in splenogonadal fusion: a case report and literature review.Diagnostic pathology · 2023Review
- A bolt from the blue in a testicular mass - continuous Splenogonadal fusion with maturation arrest.Autopsy & case reports · 2023Article
- Splenogonadal fusion: A case series of two challenging diagnoses.Clinical case reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSplenogondal fusion (SGF) is a rare congenital anomaly characterized by abnormal association between the splenic tissue and the gonads or mesonephric remnants. SGF that requires separate two-stage laparoscopic staged Fowler-Stephen orchiopexy on both the left and right sides is extremely rare. SGF could be misdiagnosed as testicular malignancy and leads to unnecessary orchiectomy. CASE PRESENTATION: This is a case of an 8-month old male infant presented with bilateral cryptorchidism, B-mode ultrasound visualized the left and right testes in the lower abdominal cavity and the upper margin of the left testicle as a hypoechoic mass extending to the spleen, indicating an undescended right testis and possible SGF on the left side. Single-site laparoscopic examination confirmed the diagnosis of SGF on the left side and an undescended right testis. As both testes were high and the right spermatic vessel was poorly developed and short, a routine single stage orchiopexy would be difficult and risky, therefore, separate two-stage laparoscopic staged Fowler-Stephen orchiopexies for both sides were implemented. Stage 1 of the staged Fowler-Stephen orchiopexy for the right side was performed first without treating the left side, Stage 2 for the right side, separation of the left testis from the spleen as well as Stage 1 for the left side were performed 7 months later, and Stage 2 for the left side was performed 7 months after that. Follow-up ultrasound 1 year after the surgery revealed no obvious abnormalities in the shapes of the testes or their blood supply. This treatment strategy prevented unnecessary orchiectomy.
conclusionsWe reported a rare case of SGF that needed separate two-stage laparoscopic staged Fowler-Stephen orchiopexies for both sides, and a review of the recent literature. SGF is a rare congenital anomaly often diagnosed incidentally during exploration/surgery for scrotal swelling/mass, cryptorchidism or inguinal hernia in young patients. Surgeons, especially pediatric surgeons should be aware of this rare condition to avoid unnecessary, life-altering radical orchiectomy. When routine single stage orchiopexy is not feasible or risky for either side, separate two-stage laparoscopic staged Fowler-Stephen orchiopexies could be performed on both the left and right sides to avoid unnecessary orchiectomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.