Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33535973›Full record

Observational studyBMC family practice2021

Interprofessional primary care during COVID-19: a survey of the provider perspective.

Catherine Donnelly, Rachelle Ashcroft, Nicole Bobbette, Christine Mills, Amanda Mofina, Todd Tran, Kyle Vader, Ashley Williams, Sandeep Gill, Jordan Miller

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC family practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Grassroots development of interprofessional primary care teams: a qualitative study in Canadian family practices.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Catherine DonnellyQueen's University, 31 George Street, Kingston, Ontario, K7L 3N6, Canada. catherine.donnelly@queensu.ca.
Rachelle AshcroftUniversity of Toronto, 246 Bloor Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 1V4, Canada.
Nicole BobbetteCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, 1001 Queen St. West, Toronto, Ontario, M6J 1H4, Canada.
Christine MillsQueen's University, 31 George Street, Kingston, Ontario, K7L 3N6, Canada.
Amanda MofinaQueen's University, 31 George Street, Kingston, Ontario, K7L 3N6, Canada.
Todd TranQueen's University, 31 George Street, Kingston, Ontario, K7L 3N6, Canada.
Kyle VaderQueen's University, 31 George Street, Kingston, Ontario, K7L 3N6, Canada.
Ashley WilliamsQueen's University, 31 George Street, Kingston, Ontario, K7L 3N6, Canada.
Sandeep GillAssociation of Family Health Teams of Ontario, 400 University Avenue, Suite 2100, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1S5, Canada.
Jordan MillerQueen's University, 31 George Street, Kingston, Ontario, K7L 3N6, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInterprofessional primary care (IPC) teams provide comprehensive and coordinated care and are ideally equipped to support those populations most at risk of adverse health outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic, including older adults, and patients with chronic physical and mental health conditions. There has been little focus on the experiences of healthcare teams and no studies have examined IPC practice during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic. The objective of the study was to describe the state of interprofessional health provider practice within IPC teams during the COVID-19 pandemic.

methodsObservational cross-sectional design. A web-based survey was deployed to IPC providers working in team-based primary care clinics in the province of Ontario, Canada. The survey included 26 close-ended and six open-ended questions. Close-ended questions were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Content analysis was used to analyze the open-ended questions.

results445 surveys were included in the final analysis. Service delivery shifted from in-person care (77% pre-COVID-19) to telephone (76.5% during the COVID-19 pandemic). Less than half of the respondents (40%) reported receiving any training for virtual delivery. Wait times to access team members were reported to have decreased. There has also been a shift in what IPC providers report as the most commonly seen conditions, with increases in visits related to mental health concerns, acute infections (including COVID-19), social isolation, and resource navigation. Respondents also reported a reduction in healthcare provision for multiple chronic conditions including diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and chronic pain.

conclusionsIPC teams are rapidly shifting their practice to supporting their patients during the pandemic. A surge in mental health issues has been seen and is expected to continue to increase in response to COVID-19. Understanding early experiences can help plan for future pandemic waves.

Indexed as

Interprofessional RelationsCOVID-19Cross-Sectional StudiesHumansMental DisordersOntarioPatient Care TeamPractice Patterns, Physicians'Primary Health CareSurveys and QuestionnairesCOVID-19interprofessional primary carePrimary care teams

Identifiers

PMID33535973
PMCPMC7857097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.