Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33535924›Full record

Trial reportQuarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)2021

Training-dependent transfer within a set of nested tasks.

Joseph P Rennie, Jonathan Jones, Duncan E Astle

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Joseph P RennieMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Jonathan JonesMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Duncan E AstleMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7042-5392

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_00005/2Medical Research Council MC_UU_00030/2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extended practice on a particular cognitive task can boost the performance of other tasks, even though they themselves have not been practised. This transfer of benefits appears to be specific, occurring most when tasks are very similar to those being trained. But what type of similarity is most important for predicting transfer? This question is addressed with a tightly controlled randomised design, with a relatively large sample (

Indexed as

Transfer, PsychologyHumanscognitive trainingpractice effectstask-switchingTrainingtransfer

Identifiers

PMID33535924
PMCPMC7614448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.