Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33535557›Full record

ReviewBiomedicines2021

What Is Known about Theragnostic Strategies in Colorectal Cancer.

Alessandro Parisi, Giampiero Porzio, Fanny Pulcini, Katia Cannita, Corrado Ficorella, Vincenzo Mattei, Simona Delle Monache

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedicines, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Dynamic liquid biopsy components as predictive and prognostic biomarkers in colorectal cancer.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alessandro ParisiDepartment of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, 67100 L'Aquila, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4629-7762
Giampiero PorzioMedical Oncology Unit, St. Salvatore Hospital, 67100 L'Aquila, Italy.
Fanny PulciniDepartment of Biotechnology and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, 67100 L'Aquila, Italy.
Katia CannitaMedical Oncology Unit, St. Salvatore Hospital, 67100 L'Aquila, Italy.
Corrado FicorellaMedical Oncology Unit, St. Salvatore Hospital, 67100 L'Aquila, Italy.
Vincenzo MatteiBiomedicine and Advanced Technologies Rieti Center, Sabina Universitas, via Angelo Maria Ricci 35A, 02100 Rieti, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4677-088X
Simona Delle MonacheDepartment of Biotechnology and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, 67100 L'Aquila, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8153-915X
University of L'Aquila · ITIMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the paradigmatic shift occurred in recent years for defined molecular subtypes in the metastatic setting treatment, colorectal cancer (CRC) still remains an incurable disease in most of the cases. Therefore, there is an urgent need for new tools and biomarkers for both early tumor diagnosis and to improve personalized treatment. Thus, liquid biopsy has emerged as a minimally invasive tool that is capable of detecting genomic alterations from primary or metastatic tumors, allowing the prognostic stratification of patients, the detection of the minimal residual disease after surgical or systemic treatments, the monitoring of therapeutic response, and the development of resistance, establishing an opportunity for early intervention before imaging detection or worsening of clinical symptoms. On the other hand, preclinical and clinical evidence demonstrated the role of gut microbiota dysbiosis in promoting inflammatory responses and cancer initiation. Altered gut microbiota is associated with resistance to chemo drugs and immune checkpoint inhibitors, whereas the use of microbe-targeted therapies including antibiotics, pre-probiotics, and fecal microbiota transplantation can restore response to anticancer drugs, promote immune response, and therefore support current treatment strategies in CRC. In this review, we aim to summarize preclinical and clinical evidence for the utilization of liquid biopsy and gut microbiota in CRC.

Indexed as

CRCCTCctDNAgut microbiotaliquid biopsymi-RNAnc-RNA

Identifiers

PMID33535557
PMCPMC7912746
OpenAlexW3128912322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.