Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33535518›Full record

ArticleCells2021

Differences in Homomorphic Sex Chromosomes Are Associated with Population Divergence in Sex Determination in

Peta Hill, Foyez Shams, Christopher P Burridge, Erik Wapstra, Tariq Ezaz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cells, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Cytogenetically Elusive Sex Chromosomes in Scincoidean Lizards.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Peta HillDiscipline of Biological Sciences, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 5, Sandy Bay, TAS 7000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6190-6426
Foyez ShamsInstitute for Applied Ecology, University of Canberra, Bruce, ACT 2601, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5919-0617
Christopher P BurridgeDiscipline of Biological Sciences, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 5, Sandy Bay, TAS 7000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8185-6091
Erik WapstraDiscipline of Biological Sciences, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 5, Sandy Bay, TAS 7000, Australia.
Tariq EzazInstitute for Applied Ecology, University of Canberra, Bruce, ACT 2601, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4763-1347
University of Tasmania · AUUniversity of Canberra · AU

Funding

Australia and Pacific Science Foundation APSF 17/8Holsworth Wildlife Research Endowment NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sex determination directs development as male or female in sexually reproducing organisms. Evolutionary transitions in sex determination have occurred frequently, suggesting simple mechanisms behind the transitions, yet their detail remains elusive. Here we explore the links between mechanisms of transitions in sex determination and sex chromosome evolution at both recent and deeper temporal scales (<1 Myr; ~79 Myr). We studied a rare example of a species with intraspecific variation in sex determination,

Indexed as

AnimalsBiological EvolutionFemaleKaryotypeMaleSex ChromosomesSex Determination Analysiscryptic sex chromosomesGSDkaryotypeNiveoscincusTSD

Identifiers

PMID33535518
PMCPMC7912723
OpenAlexW3128399793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.