Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33535443›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2021

Incoherence between Systemic Hemodynamic and Microcirculatory Response to Fluid Challenge in Critically Ill Patients.

Paolo De Santis, Chiara De Fazio, Federico Franchi, Ottavia Bond, Jean-Louis Vincent, Jacques Creteur, Fabio Silvio Taccone, Sabino Scolletta

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Risk and prognostic factors of replantation failure in patients with severe traumatic major limb mutilation.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Paolo De SantisDepartment of Intensive Care, Hôpital Erasme, Cliniques Universitaires de Bruxelles Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Route de Lennik, 808-1070 Brussels, Belgium.
Chiara De FazioDepartment of Intensive Care, Hôpital Erasme, Cliniques Universitaires de Bruxelles Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Route de Lennik, 808-1070 Brussels, Belgium.
Federico FranchiDepartment of Intensive Care, Hôpital Erasme, Cliniques Universitaires de Bruxelles Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Route de Lennik, 808-1070 Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-4448-1892
Ottavia BondDepartment of Intensive Care, Hôpital Erasme, Cliniques Universitaires de Bruxelles Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Route de Lennik, 808-1070 Brussels, Belgium.
Jean-Louis VincentDepartment of Intensive Care, Hôpital Erasme, Cliniques Universitaires de Bruxelles Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Route de Lennik, 808-1070 Brussels, Belgium.
Jacques CreteurDepartment of Intensive Care, Hôpital Erasme, Cliniques Universitaires de Bruxelles Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Route de Lennik, 808-1070 Brussels, Belgium.
Fabio Silvio TacconeDepartment of Intensive Care, Hôpital Erasme, Cliniques Universitaires de Bruxelles Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Route de Lennik, 808-1070 Brussels, Belgium.
Sabino ScollettaDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, Emergency-Urgency and Organ Transplantation, University Hospital of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy.
Université Libre de Bruxelles · BEUniversity of Siena · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of the study was to assess the coherence between systemic hemodynamic and microcirculatory response to a fluid challenge (FC) in critically ill patients.

methodsWe prospectively collected data in patients requiring a FC whilst cardiac index (CI) and microcirculation were monitored. The sublingual microcirculation was assessed using the incident dark field (IDF) CytoCam device (Braedius Medical, Huizen, The Netherlands). The proportion of small perfused vessels (PPV) was calculated. Fluid responders were defined by at least a 10% increase in CI during FC. Responders according to changes in microcirculation were defined by at least 10% increase in PPV at the end of FC. Cohen's kappa coefficient was measured to assess the agreement to categorize patients as "responders" to FC according to CI and PPV.

resultsA total of 41 FC were performed in 38 patients, after a median time of 1 (0-1) days after ICU admission. Most of the fluid challenges (39/41, 95%) were performed using crystalloids and the median total amount of fluid was 500 (500-500) mL. The main reasons for fluid challenge were oliguria (

conclusionsThe results of this heterogenous population of critically ill patients suggest incoherence in fluid responsiveness between systemic and microvascular hemodynamics; larger cohort prospective studies with adequate a priori sample size calculations are needed to confirm these findings.

Indexed as

fluid challengefluid responsivenessmicrocirculationtissue perfusion

Identifiers

PMID33535443
PMCPMC7867072
OpenAlexW3127520561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.