Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33535060›Full record

Observational studyAmerican journal of ophthalmology2021

Effect of Taping Face Masks on Quantitative Particle Counts Near the Eye: Implications for Intravitreal Injections in the COVID-19 Era.

William G Schultheis, James E Sharpe, Qiang Zhang, Samir N Patel, Ajay E Kuriyan, Allen Chiang, Sunir J Garg, Jason Hsu

Open access · bronzeAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in American journal of ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Risks and benefits of face masks in children.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

William G SchultheisFrom the Sidney Kimmel Medical College (WGS, SNP, AEK, AC, SJG, JH), Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
James E SharpeVision Research Center (JES, QZ), Wills Eye Hospital, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia Pennsylvania, USA.
Qiang ZhangVision Research Center (JES, QZ), Wills Eye Hospital, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia Pennsylvania, USA.
Samir N PatelFrom the Sidney Kimmel Medical College (WGS, SNP, AEK, AC, SJG, JH), Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA; Retina Service of Wills Eye Hospital (SNP, AEK, AC, SJG, JH), Mid Atlantic Retina, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Ajay E KuriyanFrom the Sidney Kimmel Medical College (WGS, SNP, AEK, AC, SJG, JH), Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA; Retina Service of Wills Eye Hospital (SNP, AEK, AC, SJG, JH), Mid Atlantic Retina, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Allen ChiangFrom the Sidney Kimmel Medical College (WGS, SNP, AEK, AC, SJG, JH), Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA; Retina Service of Wills Eye Hospital (SNP, AEK, AC, SJG, JH), Mid Atlantic Retina, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Sunir J GargFrom the Sidney Kimmel Medical College (WGS, SNP, AEK, AC, SJG, JH), Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA; Retina Service of Wills Eye Hospital (SNP, AEK, AC, SJG, JH), Mid Atlantic Retina, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Jason HsuFrom the Sidney Kimmel Medical College (WGS, SNP, AEK, AC, SJG, JH), Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA; Retina Service of Wills Eye Hospital (SNP, AEK, AC, SJG, JH), Mid Atlantic Retina, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA. Electronic address: jhsu@midatlanticretina.com.
Thomas Jefferson University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine the effect of taping the top of face masks on air particle counts directed toward the eye during simulated intravitreal injections.

designProspective observational crossover study.

methodsThirteen healthy subjects were recruited. Each wore a cloth, surgical, or N95 mask in randomized order. The number of air particles were quantified by using a particle counter suspended over the right eye while each subject breathed normally, deeply, or spoke using a standardized script. Particle counts were obtained with the top of each mask taped and not taped. The main outcome measurements were particle counts of 0.3, 0.5, 1, 3, 5, and 10 μm and total particle counts.

resultsTaping cloth masks while subjects were speaking significantly reduced particle counts for the 0.3- (P = .03), 0.5- (P = .01), and 1-μm (P = .03) particles and total particle counts (P = .008) compared to no taping. Taping the top of cloth masks during normal or deep breathing did not significantly affect particle counts compared to no taping. Taping the top of surgical or N95 masks did not significantly alter particle counts for any breathing condition tested.

conclusionsTaping the top of cloth masks prior to simulated intravitreal injections significantly reduced air particle counts directed toward the eye when subjects were speaking compared to no taping. This may have implications for decreasing air particles reaching the eye during intravitreal injections, including aerosolized droplets from a patient's mouth that may carry oral pathogens.

Indexed as

MasksSARS-CoV-2AdultCOVID-19Cross-Over StudiesDisease Transmission, InfectiousFemaleHumansMalePandemicsParticulate MatterProspective StudiesYoung AdultParticulate Matter

Identifiers

PMID33535060
PMCPMC9671404
OpenAlexW3126933717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.