Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33534951›Full record

SynthesisJournal of occupational health2021

Elbow tendinopathy and occupational biomechanical overload: A systematic review with best-evidence synthesis.

Stefania Curti, Stefano Mattioli, Roberta Bonfiglioli, Andrea Farioli, Francesco S Violante

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of occupational health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Digital Rehabilitation for Elbow Pain Musculoskeletal Conditions: A Prospective Longitudinal Cohort Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stefania CurtiDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4343-8873
Stefano MattioliDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9639-7430
Roberta BonfiglioliDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4248-4448
Andrea FarioliDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2001-2140
Francesco S ViolanteDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4084-2782
University of Bologna · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the evidence of an association between occupational and non-occupational exposure to biomechanical risk factors and lateral elbow tendinopathy, medial elbow tendinopathy, and olecranon bursitis.

methodsWe carried out a systematic review of the literature. We searched MEDLINE (up to November 2019) and checked the reference lists of relevant articles/reviews. We aimed to include studies where (a) the diagnosis was based on physical examination (symptoms plus clinical signs) and imaging data (if any); and (b) the exposure was evaluated with video analysis and/or direct measurements. A quality assessment of the included studies was performed along with an evaluation of the level of evidence of a causal relationship.

resultsWe included four studies in the qualitative synthesis: two prospective cohorts and two cross-sectional studies. All the included studies investigated "lateral/medial epicondylitis", albeit the diagnosis was not supported by imaging techniques. Two cohort studies suggested that a combination of biomechanical risk factors for wrist/forearm is associated with increased risk of "lateral epicondylitis". This association was not observed in the two included cross-sectional studies. The cohort studies suggested that a Strain Index score higher than 5 or 6.1 could double the risk of "lateral epicondylitis". No association with increased risk of "medial epicondylitis" was observed.

conclusionsThere is limited evidence of a causal relationship between occupational exposure to biomechanical risk factors and lateral elbow tendinopathy. For medial elbow tendinopathy, the evidence is insufficient to support this causal relationship. No studies on olecranon bursitis and biomechanical overload were identified.

Indexed as

Biomechanical PhenomenaBursitisCausalityCumulative Trauma DisordersElbow TendinopathyHumansOccupational DiseasesOccupational ExposureRisk Factorselbow tendinopathymusculoskeletal diseasesoccupational exposureoccupational healthsystematic reviewupper extremity

Identifiers

PMID33534951
PMCPMC7857538
OpenAlexW3127646666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.