Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33534832›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Substitutional landscape of a split fluorescent protein fragment using high-density peptide microarrays.

Oana N Antonescu, Andreas Rasmussen, Nicole A M Damm, Ditte F Heidemann, Roman Popov, Alexander Nesterov-Mueller, Kristoffer E Johansson, Jakob R Winther

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Resemblance-Ranking Peptide Library as a Representation of a Complex Proteome.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Oana N AntonescuDepartment of Biology, Linderstrøm-Lang Centre for Protein Science, Section for Biomolecular Sciences, University for Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-1161-0835
Andreas RasmussenDepartment of Biology, Linderstrøm-Lang Centre for Protein Science, Section for Biomolecular Sciences, University for Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Nicole A M DammDepartment of Biology, Linderstrøm-Lang Centre for Protein Science, Section for Biomolecular Sciences, University for Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Ditte F HeidemannDepartment of Biology, Linderstrøm-Lang Centre for Protein Science, Section for Biomolecular Sciences, University for Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Roman PopovInstitute of Microstructure Technology, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany.
Alexander Nesterov-MuellerInstitute of Microstructure Technology, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany.
Kristoffer E JohanssonDepartment of Biology, Linderstrøm-Lang Centre for Protein Science, Section for Biomolecular Sciences, University for Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-6054-0461
Jakob R WintherDepartment of Biology, Linderstrøm-Lang Centre for Protein Science, Section for Biomolecular Sciences, University for Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-6995-9154

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Split fluorescent proteins have wide applicability as biosensors for protein-protein interactions, genetically encoded tags for protein detection and localization, as well as fusion partners in super-resolution microscopy. We have here established and validated a novel platform for functional analysis of leave-one-out split fluorescent proteins (LOO-FPs) in high throughput and with rapid turnover. We have screened more than 12,000 variants of the beta-strand split fragment using high-density peptide microarrays for binding and functional complementation in Green Fluorescent Protein. We studied the effect of peptide length and the effect of different linkers to the solid support. We further mapped the effect of all possible amino acid substitutions on each position as well as in the context of some single and double amino acid substitutions. As all peptides were tested in 12 duplicates, the analysis rests on a firm statistical basis allowing for confirmation of the robustness and precision of the method. Based on experiments in solution, we conclude that under the given conditions, the signal intensity on the peptide microarray faithfully reflects the binding affinity between the split fragments. With this, we are able to identify a peptide with 9-fold higher affinity than the starting peptide.

Indexed as

Peptide LibraryAmino Acid SequenceBinding SitesGreen Fluorescent ProteinsModels, MolecularPeptidesProtein Array AnalysisProtein Interaction MappingSpectrometry, FluorescenceGreen Fluorescent ProteinsPeptide LibraryPeptides

Identifiers

PMID33534832
PMCPMC7857580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.