Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33534786›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Mental health and psychosocial support strategies in highly contagious emerging disease outbreaks of substantial public concern: A systematic scoping review.

Angela M Kunzler, Jutta Stoffers-Winterling, Marlene Stoll, Alexander L Mancini, Sophie Lehmann, Manpreet Blessin, Donya Gilan, Isabella Helmreich, Frank Hufert, Klaus Lieb

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Resilience Interventions Conducted in Western and Eastern Countries-A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Tapping into the minds and hearts of the local public health workforce during the COVID-19 pandemic.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. 'A lot of small things make a difference'. Mental health and strategies of coping during the COVID-19 pandemic.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Active Coping and Anxiety Symptoms during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Spanish Adults.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Angela M KunzlerLeibniz Institute for Resilience Research (LIR), Mainz, Germany.
Jutta Stoffers-WinterlingLeibniz Institute for Resilience Research (LIR), Mainz, Germany.
Marlene StollLeibniz Institute for Resilience Research (LIR), Mainz, Germany.
Alexander L ManciniDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.
Sophie LehmannLeibniz Institute for Resilience Research (LIR), Mainz, Germany.
Manpreet BlessinLeibniz Institute for Resilience Research (LIR), Mainz, Germany.
Donya GilanLeibniz Institute for Resilience Research (LIR), Mainz, Germany.
Isabella HelmreichLeibniz Institute for Resilience Research (LIR), Mainz, Germany.
Frank HufertInstitute of Microbiology and Virology, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Brandenburg, Germany.
Klaus LiebLeibniz Institute for Resilience Research (LIR), Mainz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9609-4261
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DELeibniz Institute for Resilience Research · DEMedizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcute disease outbreaks such as the COVID-19 pandemic cause a high burden of psychological distress in people worldwide. Interventions to enable people to better cope with such distress should be based on the best available evidence. We therefore performed a scoping review to systematically identify and summarize the available literature of interventions that target the distress of people in the face of highly contagious disease outbreaks.

methodsMEDLINE, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science (January 2000 to May 7, 2020), and reference lists were systematically searched and screened by two independent reviewers. Quantitative and qualitative studies investigating the effects of psychological interventions before, during, and after outbreaks of highly contagious emerging infectious diseases, such as SARS, MERS, Ebola, or COVID-19 were included. Study effects were grouped (e.g. for healthcare professionals, community members, people at risk) and intervention contents at the individual and organizational level summarized. We assessed the level of evidence using a modified scheme from the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine and the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council.

resultsOf 4030 records found, 19 studies were included (two RCTs). Most interventions were delivered during-exposure and face-to-face, focused on healthcare workers and crisis personnel, and combined psychoeducation with training of coping strategies. Based on two high-quality studies, beneficial effects were reported for resilience factors (e.g. positive cognitive appraisal) and professional attitudes of healthcare workers, with mixed findings for mental health (e.g. depression). Across all studies, there was positive qualitative feedback from participants and facilitators. We identified seven ongoing studies mostly using online- and mobile-based deliveries.

conclusionsThere is preliminary evidence for beneficial effects of interventions to enable people to better cope with the distress of highly contagious emerging disease outbreaks. Besides the need for more high-quality studies, the summarized evidence may inform decision makers to plan interventions during the current pandemic and to develop pandemic preparedness plans.

Indexed as

Mental HealthPsychosocial Support SystemsAdaptation, PsychologicalCOVID-19Disease OutbreaksHealth PersonnelHumansResilience, PsychologicalSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID33534786
PMCPMC7857635
OpenAlexW3029341022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.