ArticleAnnual review of neuroscience2021
A Common Space Approach to Comparative Neuroscience.
Article in Annual review of neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
44 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Accurate localization and coactivation profiles of the frontal eye field and inferior frontal junction: an ALE and MACM fMRI meta-analysis.Brain structure & function · 2023Pooled it
- Genetic and phylogenetic uncoupling of structure and function in human transmodal cortex.Nature communications · 2022Pooled it
- Comprehensive profiling of brain dynamics during anesthesia across phylogeny.Nature neuroscience · 2026Article
- Brain activity, disruption and connectivity comparisons identify origins of human metacognition in other primates.Nature human behaviour · 2026Article
- On the impact of tactile processing on motor cortex: how touch shapes motor behaviour.Brain structure & function · 2026Review
- Translating brain anatomy and disease from mouse to human in latent gene expression space.EBioMedicine · 2026Article
- Comparing the Limbic-Frontal Connectome across the Primate Order: Conservation of Connections and Implications for Translational Neuroscience.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026Article
- Convergent and Divergent Connectivity Patterns of the Arcuate Fasciculus in Macaques and Humans.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Article
- Reconstructing the human brain's wiring diagram from axons up.Trends in neurosciences · 2026Review
- Article
- Comparative gene editing reduces dopamine receptor levels across rodent species.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Hippocampal architecture viewed through the eyes of methodological development.Anatomical science international · 2025Review
- Cross-species neuroanatomy in primates using tractography.Brain structure & function · 2025Review
- Benchmarking macaque brain gene expression for horizontal and vertical translation.Science advances · 2025Article
- The Chimpanzee Brainnetome Atlas reveals distinct connectivity and gene expression profiles relative to humans.Innovation (Cambridge (Mass.)) · 2025Article
- Generalising XTRACT tractography protocols across common macaque brain templates.Brain structure & function · 2024Article
- Towards multi-modal, multi-species brain atlases: part two.Brain structure & function · 2024Article
- Comparing mouse and human cingulate cortex organization using functional connectivity.Brain structure & function · 2024Article
- Gradients of Brain Organization: Smooth Sailing from Methods Development to User Community.Neuroinformatics · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Comparative neuroscience is entering the era of big data. New high-throughput methods and data-sharing initiatives have resulted in the availability of large, digital data sets containing many types of data from ever more species. Here, we present a framework for exploiting the new possibilities offered. The multimodality of the data allows vertical translations, which are comparisons of different aspects of brain organization within a single species and across scales. Horizontal translations compare particular aspects of brain organization across species, often by building abstract feature spaces. Combining vertical and horizontal translations allows for more sophisticated comparisons, including relating principles of brain organization across species by contrasting horizontal translations, and for making formal predictions of unobtainable data based on observed results in a model species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.