ArticleThe American Journal of dermatopathology2021
Pure and Mixed Desmoplastic Melanomas: A Retrospective Clinicopathologic Comparison of 33 Cases.
Article in The American Journal of dermatopathology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Desmoplastic Melanoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Immunohistochemistry for Skin Cancers: New Insights into Diagnosis and Treatment of Melanoma.Cancers · 2025Review
- Article
- A Physician's Guide to the Use of Gene Expression Profile Ancillary Diagnostic Testing for Cutaneous Melanocytic Neoplasms.The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPure and mixed desmoplastic melanomas (DMs) may have different natural histories and behaviors.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective review of patients diagnosed with DM at our institution between January 1997 and April 2019. A total of 33 unique DMs were identified and subsequently analyzed based on the histologic type (pure vs. mixed).
resultsThe majority (57.6%) of our cases were classified as pure histology. Patients with pure DMs were more likely to be men (P = 0.035) and be older than 65 years (P = 0.019) compared with patients with mixed DMs. Patients with mixed DM were more likely to have mitoses present (P = 0.001) compared with patients with pure DM. There were no differences in ulceration, perineural invasion, vascular invasion, or survival between patients with pure and mixed histologic subtypes. In addition, no differences in sentinel lymph node biopsy, radiation, or chemotherapy were noted between the 2 histologic subtypes. Immunohistochemistry showed that 27.3% of the pure DMs stained with Melan-A and HMB45 were positive for these immunomarkers.
conclusionsPure and mixed variants of DM were found to have similar clinicopathologic characteristics. Patients with the mixed histologic subtype were more likely to have mitoses, but no difference in the therapeutic management or patient survival was seen between the 2 subtypes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.