ReviewSchmerz (Berlin, Germany)2021
[Psychosocial factors in the prevention of pain].
Review in Schmerz (Berlin, Germany), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Influence of Social Support on Peri-Operative Pain: A Secondary Sub-Sample Analysis of a Prospective Observational Trial.European journal of pain (London, England) · 2025Observational
- [Structure and process evaluation of complex interventions in pain therapy : Description of a methodological approach using the example of POET-Pain].Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2025Review
- The mechanisms of specialized pro-resolving mediators in pain relief: neuro-immune and neuroglial regulations.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- The PerPAIN trial: a pilot randomized controlled trial of personalized treatment allocation for chronic musculoskeletal pain-a protocol.Pilot and feasibility studies · 2022Article
- Effect of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Concept and Cluster Nursing on Psychological State and Pain of Oral Outpatients Undergoing Root Canal Therapy.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022Article
- Trajectories of Pain in Very Old Age: The Role of Eudaimonic Wellbeing and Personality.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- [Prediction and prevention of chronic postoperative pain].Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The question of pain prevention is becoming increasingly important, both in society and in science. According to the International Society for the Study of Pain, general areas for which pain prevention measures can be recommended have been defined. These approaches are mostly limited to unspecific recommendations with the aim of improving general health behaviour. Common to all of them is that they essentially address psychosocial and psychobehavioral aspects. In contrast to genetic factors or other non-modifiable environmental factors, psychosocial and psychobehavioral aspects are potentially modifiable variables, making them possible starting points for prevention programs. Furthermore, recent studies provide important knowledge about psychological and social risk factors of pain chronification and thus offer new approaches for future pain prevention strategies. At the same time, the efficacy and successful implementation of such programs is so complex that valid statements on effectiveness and benefit can only be made through care-related evaluation. This review addresses psychological and social factors in the prevention of pain. A selective literature search was carried out to this end. Based on selected studies, psychological and social predictors of pain development are presented and their potential for future pain prevention programs discussed. The article concludes with a discussion of possible implications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33534105What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.